The relay also gets warm. And everything that consumes power reduces the mjle per gallon.How is the small power required by the relay in a running vehicle a downside?
I have no intention to retrofit an electric fuel pump. My Response 'How would you do it?' Was intended for ThePanMan's ' I think temporarily applying starting power OR preventing it seems like the wrong way to go.' Comment.The 67 Chevy likely has a mechanical fuel pump on the left side of the engine, below the exhaust manifold. If you want to go with an electric fuel pump you'd remove the mechanical fuel pump and put a cover over the opening.
Sounds like a bit more work for not much gain. And this would most likely cause issues when the brake pedal is applied during start or an applied mid start.Another option that would not require a time-out to reset the crank-enable latch would be to reset it from the brake light circuit. My thinking is that the timer is only to assure that the timer intent was to provide an automated reset rather than a time-out to inhibit starting the engine. So resetting the latched enable the first time the brake was used will achieve results close enough to the original intent, I think.
The scheme would still require the same relay to enable the cranking motor, but it would also require two more lower power relays, the first to be latched on by the hidden button, and the second, with a normally closed contact, to release the first relay when the brake light circuit was powered. Both of those functions could be done with transistors but it would be more complex, and it would require a lot more construction effort.
NOBODY applies the brake while cranking the engine! AND, more importantly, ONLY those folks who were supposed to be using the car would know the secret of the button, to which the secret of the reset could be mentioned. Consider that the only purpose of the whole project IS TO MAKE THE CAR HARDER TO START for those who are not supposed to be starting it.Sounds like a bit more work for not much gain. And this would most likely cause issues when the brake pedal is applied during start or an applied mid start.
I do. My wife does. I'm sure hundreds of thousands of others also do so. Modern cars can not be started unless you depress the brake pedal. That's pretty much a safety standard requirement for all automotive manufacturers today. Granted, the TS has a 67 vehicle which never had one of those safety devices. But to say NOBODY applies the brake while cranking the engine is a mis-speak.NOBODY applies the brake while cranking the engine!
I assume you are being facetious.The relay also gets warm. And everything that consumes power reduces the mjle per gallon.
I think the single latched relay I proposed is the simplest solution to keep the car from starting, but it you must have the delay relay, then using a 1A diode in series with a 1Ω resistor from the 12V going to the delay relay with a large capacitor (e.g. 10,000μF) to ground would likely be the best solution (below).The only item I wish to address, it the timed Redarc relay from switching off when the voltage drops whilst cranking.

So what are the statistics?Look at the statistics,
a dumb-ass-teenager might think he's smart enough to hot-wire the Car,
a professional simply brings a Tow-Truck.
It is quite literally a requirement to put your foot on the brake for many modern vehicles. Obviously this one, not so much.NOBODY applies the brake while cranking the engine!
Over here (Aus) we have a lot of theft by the youth, it’s almost all opportunistic. Keys left out, keys in car, keys left on the bench with the house unlocked ect.~90 Posts ..........
this has got to be a record !!!
Look at the statistics,
a dumb-ass-teenager might think he's smart enough to hot-wire the Car,
a professional simply brings a Tow-Truck.
.
.
.
May I ask what car you drive? Almost every passenger vehicle post 2013 requires either a brake pedal input or a clutch pedal input to start the vehicle.Mostly the requirement is to apply the brake to shift into gear. Of course, many simply start and immediately shift into drive and go. My process is to start the engine and let it idle while I buckle-up. That allows the oil pressure to rise to normal and is recommended by some engine builders. And that few seconds of idling does not waste much fuel.
You will probably discover that the engine cranks and starts without the brake, but that the lack of brake application inhibits shifting into gear to move. And preventing the uninformed from starting the car is, after all, the whole intent of the addition.
I drive Dodges. Brake to start makes no sense at all, because with most cars the trans must be in neutral to crank the engine. And most cars will not move with the trans in PARK. Manual transmission vehicles may be different today, I have not driven a current production manual tranny vehicle. Of course, the rules might be different in California.May I ask what car you drive? Almost every passenger vehicle post 2013 requires either a brake pedal input or a clutch pedal input to start the vehicle.
2017 Tacoma, V6, 6 speed automatic. Can not take it out of park unless the engine is running. Can not start it unless the brake pedal is depressed. Don't know off hand if after it's been started and still in park whether you have to step on the brake to shift out of park or not; my guess is yes, you still have to. When in all shift-positions the driver has the ability to shut the engine off. Park, Reverse, Neutral, Drive (or manual shifting using the up/down shift lever). You can shut it off in neutral then restart it but ONLY if you step on the brake pedal. Same thing is true for the Toyota Venza. Wife drives a 2009.Brake to start makes no sense at all, because with most cars the trans must be in neutral to crank the engine.