What does that mean?But Sensor two acts a "proximity dimmer" which is cool, but still not quite right.
What does that mean?But Sensor two acts a "proximity dimmer" which is cool, but still not quite right.
Yes, will do. Due to the rapid cutoff, and high voltage transient generated by the bEMF, I will use a bridge of 1n5408's to capture the wasted energy and store it in a capacitor.You will need a reverse-biased diode (cathode to Vcc, anode to Q3 drain) connected across the solenoid to protect Q3 from the back-emf spike when Q3 switches off.
That's awesome, thanks! I'll update the circuit and let you know how it goes.One last though. This is how it should be wired:
View attachment 287933
Is that a ceramic/tanatalum/Electrolytic?Slight modification. Added C1 to prevent circuit latching ON when power is first applied.
View attachment 287977
All three choices are fine. It's not in series but in parallel with the base-emitter of Q2Is that a ceramic/tanatalum/Electrolytic?
Interestingly, the latch DOES work without the capacitor. Adding it now because I have to FULLY magnetize the second sensor (ie. make the LED turn fully off, then it stays off) Both the same thing, 44E-402.All three choices are fine. It's not in series but in parallel with the base-emitter of Q2
Correct but sometimes with my circuit on the breadboard it latch ON when first powered up. I verified your issue and since have moved the cap to the base of Q1 and ground. You can leave the cap out if not experiencing the problem I had but be aware if it does.Interestingly, the latch DOES work without the capacitor.
Thankyou for your time and effort, it means a lot. This will allow the whole thing to work.You will need two identical latch circuits composed of Q1,Q2 and Q3,Q4.