- Yes, now when you tell it, i remember something from that period. The 80's and 90's. It was as you say, very basic,very analog. I remember some titles in the magazines i read but not understood that well because i was too young and really not very knowledgeable. I remember some awful circuits, very complicated, and as you say all analog, doing gods know what. But it rise my imagination about (some) posibilities, even i didnt understood them. Ofcourse I was smelling electronics back then. Yes, i start to forget ,sign that i get old. Can you describe in Words, the modules in your circuit? Or on picture if you want. I dont mind. As long as i get the context better (for the opamp integration). For example: I used That to link with that and feed its signal to this, then processed and split to X and Y ...etc.
- I start to get the feeling that in this case, i mean your pingpong circuit, you used the opamp simply because you needed to generate a triangular waveform. And it was the simplest variant to build. I suppose there are other ways to make such a waveform, but probably are more complicated in circuit, so this opamp basically saved you space and made everything more logical and easy to build, because as you said is "like a black box". To be fair, every IC is a little "black box" that does "someting" and this is the first time i encounter the idea of the "black box", i never cross over it before and it is a fun concept, i like it. So choosing the opamp not only saved space on the circuit board but also made everything more logical and easy to see and link and troubleshoot perhaps.
I hope im guessing right.
- Then.... hmmm, my next Logical question is: How many outputs an opamp can make? Like your triangular waveform, you choose it because you knew that is one posible output that this IC can make. I think, you mentioned already, that because opamp is making mathematical operations, the waveforms outputs are about them? And when you think -opamp- you basically think -mathematical operation- ? Like add,substract, and this one integrator, and so on? Im again, guessing now. Not really sure im hitting the right nail, yet. But im sure im very close.
- I start to get the feeling that in this case, i mean your pingpong circuit, you used the opamp simply because you needed to generate a triangular waveform. And it was the simplest variant to build. I suppose there are other ways to make such a waveform, but probably are more complicated in circuit, so this opamp basically saved you space and made everything more logical and easy to build, because as you said is "like a black box". To be fair, every IC is a little "black box" that does "someting" and this is the first time i encounter the idea of the "black box", i never cross over it before and it is a fun concept, i like it. So choosing the opamp not only saved space on the circuit board but also made everything more logical and easy to see and link and troubleshoot perhaps.
I hope im guessing right.
- Then.... hmmm, my next Logical question is: How many outputs an opamp can make? Like your triangular waveform, you choose it because you knew that is one posible output that this IC can make. I think, you mentioned already, that because opamp is making mathematical operations, the waveforms outputs are about them? And when you think -opamp- you basically think -mathematical operation- ? Like add,substract, and this one integrator, and so on? Im again, guessing now. Not really sure im hitting the right nail, yet. But im sure im very close.
Last edited:












