Both Linear Tech and Maxim make multi-pole video filter IC's.
As long as you take account of the value of ε implied by your selection of 0.1 dB ripple in the passbandI did a quick hand calculation with the Butterworth transfer function to determine the filter order so I assume that it is basically the same but with the Chebyshev transfer function, is that correct?
* I cannot understand why the last 4-stage filter in your original post contains one 2nd-order stage (the 1st one) which uses a passive RLC lowpass. Why not a S&K stage like the other three?I do not know about the "direct" realization and will try to find out more about it but if you have literature suggestions I will be very happy to read up on them.
The circuit is the last one in my original post, there is no option to choose passive realization.
|Thread starter||Similar threads||Forum||Replies||Date|
|S||Bode Plot First-order Butterworth Filter||Analog & Mixed-Signal Design||14|
|2nd order HPF cutoff frequency||Analog & Mixed-Signal Design||3|
|LTspice simulation on 4th order active bandpass filter using multiple feedback and Sallen-Key topologies didn't go as I expected||Homework Help||35|
|T||Node Analysis of 2nd order Sallen-Key question||General Science, Physics & Math||8|
|S||sallen key nth order bandpass filter||Homework Help||1|
|Bode Plot First-order Butterworth Filter|
|2nd order HPF cutoff frequency|
|LTspice simulation on 4th order active bandpass filter using multiple feedback and Sallen-Key topologies didn't go as I expected|
|Node Analysis of 2nd order Sallen-Key question|
|sallen key nth order bandpass filter|
by Jeff Child
by Jake Hertz
by Jake Hertz