What you can find in these forums is that there are collectively hundreds of years of experience available, and correct answers to adequate questions. There are also guesses from the unknowing so it is useful to pay attention to responses.Just got it all together and it's working fine. Many thanks, you guys are amazing!
Glad to hear you had success !Just got it all together and it's working fine. Many thanks, you guys are amazing!
I'll rewire as per your suggestion and see if anything changes.The right hand part of your diagram in in post #17 is not clear to me as it does not show where the mains supply is connected. It should be connected to In the UK the two mains wires are called live (L) and neutral (N) I don't know if the same terms are Used in Australia. I will use these terms. This is how it should be connected.
Live to U1 - C - E
Neutral to U2 - B - F
A - Z2
D - V1
It does not matter if live and neutral are swapped over.
I think this will be how you have it connected but this is just to confirm it.
You say that the new motor is slightly more powerful than the old one. What are the ratings of the two motors ?
Is the beaker that trips part of the lathe or is it in the supply to the lathe and what is it's rating ? If it is part of the lathe it is probably some type of thermal overload and it may be adjustable. If it is very old it could use oil filled dashpots to slow the response so it does not trip on the staring current. Can you give some information on the breaker ?
Les.
I see the problem, which is the operating current. If the new motor is twice the HP as the previous motor, the current drawn will approach twice as much because the motor is providing twice as much mechanical power. The current will be a bit less than twice as much because newer motors are usually more efficient. At least present requirements demand greater efficiency.I think I have live to V1, Neutral to Z2 (or vice versa).
The "breaker" is actually part of the 4 way power strip that has a reset button on it. The strip is rated at 10A, the lathe is the only thing connected to it. If we take that strip out of the picture, the house Circuit breaker trips instead (which means I have to go outside to reset it). The motor itself also has a built in circuit breaker, but that hasn't tripped yet.
If it helps we are talking about 240v here, not sure if it's the same in the UK.
The old motor was .75hp, the new is 1.5hp with a similar footprint.
I have taken pictures of both plates, I hope they show the requited data.I see the problem, which is the operating current. If the new motor is twice the HP as the previous motor, the current drawn will approach twice as much because the motor is providing twice as much mechanical power. The current will be a bit less than twice as much because newer motors are usually more efficient. At least present requirements demand greater efficiency.
So we got an answer in post#26, that the motor is not "slightly more powerful," but rather twice the power. With an electrical power of 760 watts per HP, the new motor will require 1150 watts if it is 100% efficient. That is a lot more than the theoretical 575 watts drawn by the previous motor.
What are the ratings on the name-plate of the motors? That can tell us the whole story and avoid any guesses.
I'm reading 6.7A on the data plate of the new motor - is there something I'm missing in regards to the 11.7?There you have it, if my reading is correct. 11.7 amps should trip the overload protection after a bit.
OK, the photo was not very clear on my screen. That seems about right for a 3/4 HP motor using 230 volts.I'm reading 6.7A on the data plate of the new motor - is there something I'm missing in regards to the 11.7?
To fix this - do I have to go with a 15A power outlet? Or something else entirely?
(Yes, I said slight increase in power - its the way I talk, which unfortunately doesn't come across in writing very well. Something for me to remember.)