Deleted member 115935
- Joined Dec 31, 1969
- 0
Thanks @crutschowNot if it's properly driven and terminated.
I have no problem with your comment, but I'd disagree.
Like you, been at it many years,
and as soon as I see a digital design done by analog engineers I shudder.
I must also say, I do RF / analog, and many a real analog engineer shudders at my RF designs,
my only excuse is my RF designs are not for production, so good enough is all thats needed.
The number of digital systems that end up having a sine wave sent to a analog designed digital section that I see having problems is amazing. To us in digits, things have to align on the edges, edges have to be sharp else you end up with jitter, especially if there is noise around the sample point which on Coax there always seems to be high frequency noise,
Analog guys then try to filter the noise out, adding band pass / low pass circuits,
makes clock better but adds a temperature / voltage / time variable delay to the clock,
and as digital people , we have strict timing limits, we have problems with a variable clock,.
Now days , I try to make certain the interface to any analog system is asynchronous,
with the data encoded with its clock,
and if a clock is needed clock is sent via differential pair, with a decent LVDS driver / receiver,
unless clock is only for analog use, when its a nice sine wave ,
( I once had to de bug a timing system designed by analog engineers, to change the timing sequence,
it was multiple mono stables
another time, I had a design to re design, that had multiple clocks going into it, all over coax, and surprise, as the temperature changed or over time, the digits fell over, due to clock set up / hold drifting..
)
I am in aw as to what analog engineers do, but they can not design digits


