Welcome to AAC!

Is this school work?

 

I need help for my master degree.

 

Show your attempts at solving this. Start by applying KCL and/or KVL at each node. You do know what KCL/KVL means?

@ApacheKid - thats not helpful!

 

I need help for my master degree.

Master's degree? I thought Kirchhoff's laws were 1st year bachelor's degree.

 

Master's degree? I thought Kirchhoff's laws were 1st year bachelor's degree.

Might be a module in another subject.

 

I need help for my master degree.

You shouldn't need it. This is something taught at the undergraduate level.

 

You shouldn't need it. This is something taught at the undergraduate level.

Is a guide to arrive to the master and i am solving

 

I will try to do with mesh

 

Is a guide to arrive to the master and i am solving

Like a foundation course?

 

Show your attempts at solving this. Start by applying KCL and/or KVL at each node. You do know what KCL/KVL means?

@ApacheKid - thats not helpful!

I have a feeling he was kidding and picked a random whole number but i havent solved this network yet.

For example (via South Park 'AWESOM-O'):
Question:
"How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?"
Answer: "17"

To the thread starter:
Yes you just need to apply some method of network analysis and that's the usual way to handle these kinds of problems.

 

I will try to do with mesh

I never touch mesh, and this is just a simple 2-node circuit as shown in the attached view. But imagine my surprise when one of the node voltages was shown to be 42! (actually 41.777777). But I was too tired to verify the answer.

 

I never touch mesh, and this is just a simple 2-node circuit as shown in the attached view. But imagine my surprise when one of the node voltages was shown to be 42! (actually 41.777777). But I was too tired to verify the answer.

Thank you do much for your help. With this I Will fight to solve it

 

I never touch mesh, and this is just a simple 2-node circuit as shown in the attached view. But imagine my surprise when one of the node voltages was shown to be 42! (actually 41.777777). But I was too tired to verify the answer.

I could verify it later sometime but you seem to have done a good enough job.

 

Thank you do much for your help. With this I Will fight to solve it

What techniques have you been taught / researched to solve these sort of problems

 

Hmmm, I get 41.81818, but yes, close to 42!

 

I never touch mesh, and this is just a simple 2-node circuit as shown in the attached view. But imagine my surprise when one of the node voltages was shown to be 42! (actually 41.777777). But I was too tired to verify the answer.

Now that you're rested up, have you verified your answer? This problem is the sort that can lead to sign confusion.

 

Now that you're rested up, have you verified your answer? This problem is the sort that can lead to sign confusion.

I think it was the sign confusion that induced my exhaustion. It seemed this problem was deliberately designed to lead one into making a polarity error (and it may have accomplished its purpose in my case.)

 

I think it was the sign confusion that induced my exhaustion. It seemed this problem was deliberately designed to lead one into making a polarity error (and it may have accomplished its purpose in my case.)

Are you saying that you made a polarity error, that there is not a node voltage near 42 volts?

 

Are you saying that you made a polarity error, that there is not a node voltage near 42 volts?

No.