You just showed a picture of the tap blaster not a link. The answer I gave was based on the ones I had used 40 years ago, and the ones I've seen plans for on the internet.
Sorry
You just showed a picture of the tap blaster not a link. The answer I gave was based on the ones I had used 40 years ago, and the ones I've seen plans for on the internet.
Hello,
What file type do you want to upload?
The file types allowed are quite a few:
zip, txt, pdf, djvu, png, jpg, jpeg, jpe, gif, doc, hex, lbr, sch, svg, asc, asy, asm, lib, cir, rar, sub, py, ods, odt, csv
Bertus
To be honest I did not look at the schematic in post #116. I had saved your schematic EDM2.pdf on my computer to save going back to previous posts to look at it. I now see you have used two sets of changeover contacts and one of them is holding the set input high on the charge flipflop when the contacts are in the stopped state. I intended you to also have it connected to the set input of the discharge flipflop. (NOTE you should have a resistor to pull the set inputs down to ground when that relay contact is open.)Didn't mean completely just that partial schematic. Did you see the second one in post #116? I'll have to think about what you were saying and try to understand what you mean in this last post.
I've understood from early on in the thread the sequence of events from you text description. The difficulty I am having is undestanding why you want the "C" signal floating when there is no current through the gap.What I've been trying to do with the comparator for output"C" is detect when the gap is 2 diode drops above ground and then shut down the 'charge' mosfet. doing this allows the full open circuit voltage to ionize the dielectric. I found this in a paper online about EDM.
I will try downloading "Dip Trace" and see if I find it easy to use.The software I'm using is called DipTrace, and is free for non profit use. I have tried to learn or understand how to use every one of the free software out there with little effect. But DipTrace was the easiest for me.
I have played round with electrical and mechanical thing for most of my life. (I am now 74) It was using valves (Tubes as they are called in the US) at first. Transistors only became available when I was in my middle to late teens. You have a reasonable knowledge of electronics so it is easy to try to explain things. After being on the ETO forum and this forum I am amazed how some people with no electrical knowledge want to start to repair something as complicated and dangerous as switch mode power supplies. Also there are so many of them that won't answer questions about their problem. I will now go and try to download "Dip Trace.Trying to learn all of this stuff starting around age 58 is not easy. Now 70 and slowly getting the hang of things. Knew what I wanted and needed to do, but not having the knowledge on how to get there has been a struggle. Your the only one that has stayed with me this long, and I thank you more than I can ever explain! Most people have tried to send me down other paths because I'm not able to speak the 'language' or it doesn't match their idea of how electronics work, and it's not there fault. Mainly because what I'm doing isn't how most people use logic/digital. But then again EDM isn't like any thing most electrical engineering people ever come across. Other than the Tesla coil people or electronic ignition people who would intentionally want to make sparks, and controlled sparks at that?
I only copied the top part of the circuit. I know you meant to use what I showed connecting the relay contacts to the 'set' on both FF's. Was just trying to see if I had it correct before redrawing. Didn't know there should be a resistor on the NC terminal to ground. Will add that.To be honest I did not look at the schematic in post #116. I had saved your schematic EDM2.pdf on my computer to save going back to previous posts to look at it. I now see you have used two sets of changeover contacts and one of them is holding the set input high on the charge flipflop when the contacts are in the stopped state. I intended you to also have it connected to the set input of the discharge flipflop. (NOTE you should have a resistor to pull the set inputs down to ground when that relay contact is open.)
Both of the schematics, in post #115 and #116 have a resistor add to ground, at the comparator input.I've understood from early on in the thread the sequence of events from you text description. The difficulty I am having is undestanding why you want the "C" signal floating when there is no current through the gap.
Can't see how that will toggle the flipflop. But may be missing something.Remove U3.1 Connect the signal that went to the lower input pin of U3.1 to the lower input pin of U4.1 (I can't read all of the pin numbers on your PDF file clearly) Keep the falling edge detector and use the output of U1.3 to reset the charge flip flop by connecting it straight to the reset pin.
You're correct that tap burner is nothing like the old ones.Well, it is very difficult to upload here. It just keep saying unmatch file type or something.
That the only PDF I have left. I cant correct or making a new one unless I pay for license. I am also thinking about selling the blue print on the internet. Not a good idea to leave the plan open to public , the site not allow member to erase or even edit file. For last ten years, I have brought a lot junk books from net. This time my book will let no body down if it has ever finished.Why not post the whole set of schematics for your EDM? Is that something you designed yourself?
I hear what your saying there, I too have too much money invested in books/plans that are basically useless. And now on the internet you can't even trust a lot of what is shown, even if it is freely given.Through my life, have brought a lot junk books from net.
While I'm very flattered that you think I'm credible, many even in this forum don't feel that way toward me. And I just know enough about real electronics to be dangerous. But do have common sense in many things.I just like you start learning electronic when I was 50 that was seven years ago. I have more advantage a little by having a degree in physics. By the time, I finish my experiment I will need someone to proof(verify) my book. Someone with experience and credible. Could it be you? Ofcause I pay. And perhaps my name wont sell. I am just some stupid from Vientiane. I need one or two more years to test the machine.
The reason I picked the Fan7390 is that it is one of the highest current mosfet drivers and it is also one of the simplest. The low side mosfet can just be driven by the 12V circuit that is powering the logic. And that is the biggest reason for using the 4000 series logic instead of one of the other types, it just makes the whole circuit easier for me. And hopefully for anyone that wants to build it in the future. The high side mosfet is where it gets more complicated, it need to have more voltage on the gate than what is at the source when it is on. This is easiest with a dedicated gate driver, they are made to do that.Two days ago, I looked at your circuit. It is quite interesting. It is of discharge type, Surface quality must be exellent. I thought about going to that path once. But instead of using FAN7390, Which for me difficult to understand I would have choosen two seperate 12AC transformer to drive high level gate and low level gate.
I do understand the paradox of cascading two NPN Mosfets. But I think you can have two set of circuits one at high side another at low side, these two circuit use separate supply source. so totally you must have three transformers 2's 12V, 0,-12V and one 98Vdc. And two circuits on high and low side can communicate to each other via voltage divider or opto-coupler. For our machine extra weigh from one more small transformer is not important. And instead of driving gate with 0 and 12v you can better driven by -12 and 12v which can bring the Mosfet pass transition region faster when turning off. I use common emitter circuit to drive mosfets. That chip is good for aviation electronic where weigh is very importance.The high side Mosfet is where it gets more complicated, it need to have more voltage on the gate than what is at the source when it is on. This is easiest with a dedicated gate driver, they are made to do that.
No I am not stupid, but you need a name like Ian Fleming or Guitrau as for a book to sell. By the way, ShortBus is a pretty good name.PDF, you are wrong calling yourself stupid. An
So you think Ben Fleming is Ian's brother?but you need a name like Ian Fleming
Hi Roong, I have to think through some of what you say before giving my answer, this is one of those times.Auto industry use zener diode to detect voltage inside voltage regulator. It use to control output of alternator to 13.8V.
With zenor diode you can adjust voltage sensing a little by using dip switch and many 6volt diodes you can have a few increment in 6 volt steps. I dont know how to adjust the amp but you can play with pulse width
Yes you are right that I may as well using 8pin instead of many transistors and diodes. In the PDF I gave, you can see that beside two sets of zenor diode ,pair with a transister. I also need a Flip-flop, an AND and a NOT gate. My implementation is like this. I have two boxes of electronic for my EDM. One I call "Pulse generator" the other "Logic&IO" I want minimum wire hook up between these two. So far I have only two twist pair form two opto-coupler. Then problem arises when I need to shut down SG3525. Sometime mistake happen I dont want generator to run hot. It need command from logic&IO box so it need an extra wire between two boxes. Then I decide that the pulse generator box should have some logic on it own. And that one Flipflop and a NOT gate can be implement with a single 8pin NOR or NAND gate. Then I need one more chip to make AND gate. But I also need 5v supply rail for the box, I have only +_17v rail. So this is the reason I decide to use discrete components to implement.It looks quite mess but not I can save two 8pin chips and one 7805+ 1 6.3v capacitor.Like your use of a big circuit to turn the output off and on, many diodes, resistors and transistors taking up a big area of PCB to do the same thing that a 8 pin mosfet driver chip can do. Just my opinion but, simple is better.