Building a sensitive pickup

Thread Starter

cmartinez

Joined Jan 17, 2007
8,765
I'm trying to replicate your sim Ian, but I get the following error message:

1770464877567.png



1770465703040.png

I'm using the 741 model that @Papabravo so generously posted a while ago. And placed it in the same directory as my Draft, per his suggestion.
 
Last edited:

Thread Starter

cmartinez

Joined Jan 17, 2007
8,765
Fixed it! ... I just used an older version of LTsipce ... now I can start playing with this thing, see if I can tweak it a little
 

Ian0

Joined Aug 7, 2020
13,132
Fixed it! ... I just used an older version of LTsipce ... now I can start playing with this thing, see if I can tweak it a little
See if you can get the right op-amp model. Even SPICE knows a 741 won't work at 3.3V.
My simulation was done with an MCP6071. For some reason I can't explain, whenever I use the MCP6071 model it gets labelled "ua741".
 

bertus

Joined Apr 5, 2008
22,925
Hello,

The chip is a chargepump capacitor circuit.
It might introduce noise on the negative supply.
The LTC3260 is also a simelar circuit, but with build in LDO regulators.
The LTC3265 has also the capability to do a boost.
See the datasheet for more info.

Bertus
 

Attachments

MisterBill2

Joined Jan 23, 2018
27,530
Why not connect the pickup coil as a differential input? That will allow not having ant resistors or capacitors in series with the signal. Of course you will still need bias and feedback portions of the circuit.
 

Thread Starter

cmartinez

Joined Jan 17, 2007
8,765
Hello,

The chip is a chargepump capacitor circuit.
It might introduce noise on the negative supply.
The LTC3260 is also a simelar circuit, but with build in LDO regulators.
The LTC3265 has also the capability to do a boost.
See the datasheet for more info.

Bertus
Thanks bertus, but the price of that chip is beyond prohibitive ... and thanks for the warning about the noise.
 

Thread Starter

cmartinez

Joined Jan 17, 2007
8,765
Why not connect the pickup coil as a differential input? That will allow not having ant resistors or capacitors in series with the signal. Of course you will still need bias and feedback portions of the circuit.
Very interesting suggestion, Bill ... I'm experimenting with it right now ... see what I can get. This signal looks usable, although it's inverted because I removed C2. But it doesn't matter for my purposes. I wonder if noise would be an issue, though.

1770471704608.png
 

Thread Starter

cmartinez

Joined Jan 17, 2007
8,765
Theoretically, this would work beautifully. But something tells me I'm committing a cardinal sin, noise-wise.

1770472608549.png
 

Thread Starter

cmartinez

Joined Jan 17, 2007
8,765
BINGO! ... this is the exact behavior that I want from my circuit. I don't know if it will work in real life, though. And I guess there's only one way to find out:

1770493020485.png
 

Thread Starter

cmartinez

Joined Jan 17, 2007
8,765
It's badly distorted.
You mean the waveform at Out1 ? ... that's not relevant for my purposes. What is relevant is the High/Low voltage at Out2. That is the result I was aiming for from the beginning. I'm just hoping that two things don't happen when I build it: first, that the device picks up too much ambient noise and randomly triggers Out2, and second, that a second stage will be needed in case the waveform at Out1 is too small.
 

Ian0

Joined Aug 7, 2020
13,132
I would have deigned it with a linear amplifier, followed by a comparator with a little hysteresis, and kept the amplifier biassed at 1.8V. That way, as the signal varies, the average DC output of the amplifier stays the same.
 

Thread Starter

cmartinez

Joined Jan 17, 2007
8,765
I would have deigned it with a linear amplifier, followed by a comparator with a little hysteresis, and kept the amplifier biassed at 1.8V. That way, as the signal varies, the average DC output of the amplifier stays the same.
Can you make a quick sketch of your idea? ...
 

Thread Starter

cmartinez

Joined Jan 17, 2007
8,765
Also, what are your thoughts on the TL071 Op Amp ?
EDIT: Never mind, I've just noticed that the device works with a minimum of 4.5V, so it doesn't meet my requirements.
 

Danko

Joined Nov 22, 2017
2,169
Also, what are your thoughts on the TL071 Op Amp ?
EDIT: Never mind, I've just noticed that the device works with a minimum of 4.5V, so it doesn't meet my requirements.
You can try to use OPAx340 (opa340 in LTspice) device:
(10pcs) New OPA2340U $ 0.99, shipping $ 3.36
Features:
• Rail-to-Rail Input
• Rail-to-Rail Output (Within 1 mV)
• MicroSize Packages
• Wide Bandwidth: 5.5 MHz
• High Slew Rate: 6 V/μs
• Low THD + Noise: 0.0007% (f = 1 kHz)
• Low Quiescent Current: 750 μA/Channel
• Single, Dual, and Quad Versions
• Supply voltage from 2.5 V to 5 V

1770569531615.png
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Top