Why did this zener diode explode?

MrChips

Joined Oct 2, 2009
34,829
I am working on a project that moves objects on a surface with electromagnets underneath.

What do you mean by " electromagnet does not repel by simply reversing the current"? Please, tell me more... thanks :)
Current flowing in one direction causes the electromagnet to attract ferromagnetic objects.
Reverse the direction of the current and the electromagnet still attracts ferromagnetic objects.

If you don't know this then you should quit doing what you are doing now.
 

Thread Starter

fablau

Joined May 14, 2020
167
Current flowing in one direction causes the electromagnet to attract ferromagnetic objects.
Reverse the direction of the current and the electromagnet still attracts ferromagnetic objects.

If you don't know this then you should quit doing what you are doing now.
I am sorry, but you'd need to give me more information about your statement, otherwise, I don't understand the context of it. Of course, all electro-magnets still attract objects in both directions. I don't see your point and the pertinence of it with the subject of this topic, sorry.

In any case, I have spent a great deal of time studying electromagnets in the past 2 years for this project of mine. There is much more outside this small circuit you have no idea about, but that it is NOT important to know for what we are discussing here. So, please, be polite and don't insult my knowledge that way. I appreciate any feedback given, but please don't assume I don't know anything about a subject by just throwing questions out there without any context to test my knowledge.

I'd prefer to keep the discussion on the topic I have established when I opened this forum if you don't mind.

Thank you for your cooperation and understanding.
 

MrChips

Joined Oct 2, 2009
34,829
I asked what kind of objects you are attracting and you did not provide an answer.
I asked if you understood how electromagnets attract objects and you responded as if you did not know.
Then you asked me to provide more information which I did.

I am not being impolite. I am being honest and have provided more than enough assistance on your circuit.

A common mistake people make on their wonderful projects is they fail to reveal exactly what they are doing.
So the question still stands. What kind of materials are you attempting to move?

If you no longer require my assistance that is fine with me.
 

Thread Starter

fablau

Joined May 14, 2020
167
I asked what kind of objects you are attracting and you did not provide an answer.
I asked if you understood how electromagnets attract objects and you responded as if you did not know.
Then you asked me to provide more information which I did.

I am not being impolite. I am being honest and have provided more than enough assistance on your circuit.

A common mistake people make on their wonderful projects is they fail to reveal exactly what they are doing.
So the question still stands. What kind of materials are you attempting to move?

If you no longer require my assistance that is fine with me.
Ok, let's stop for a minute. I must have missed your question about the kind of objects I am trying to move, and I apologize if I had the impression of been "grilled" for some reason. I am sure that chatting with text and not with actual audible words, the tone gets often misintepreted.

Fact is, I don't see the pertinence of what I want to move with the circuit driving it. If we take that route, I am afraid we'll just waste a lot of time and we'll get out of focus.

Anyway, I am trying to move a puck with a permanent magnet inside and I have already successfully done that with a different circuit prototype that used different components despite very similar characteristics (but, clearly, I must have missed some details...)

What I am working on now is the same exact circuit but with different components, hence the problems that are arising. The previous circuit has worked just fine after several months of experimentation.

The project is based on this other project a friend of mine did at MIT several years ago:

https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/571985.572011

I'll certainly appreciate your assistance and I already appreciate what you have provided me.

Thank you for being communicative with me.

All the best,
 

Thread Starter

fablau

Joined May 14, 2020
167
Visibly you know nothing about Zener.
Here we go again... is this a polite way to say that? And why saying that? For sure I don't know "enough" about Zener diodes, but that doesn't mean that I don't know anything about anything else.

Can we stop with the insults and continue with a civil and polite discussion?

Thank you.
 

Thread Starter

fablau

Joined May 14, 2020
167
No problem

Maybe finding a higher powered one like the 1SMB5927 zener Diode (12V 3W ±5% Surface Mount SMB)
https://www.digikey.com.au/product-...uctor/1SMB5927BT3G/1SMB5927BT3GOSCT-ND/917729

I=P/V
=3W/12V
=250mA

Add a MOV for coil...

And it is starting to look better
@click_here Do you think this one has the same characteristics of the one you suggested:

https://www.mouser.com/ProductDetail/Diodes-Incorporated/BZT52HC12WF-7?qs=4z8IqdUrQ/uAek/8AIVCQA==

It still has 250mA forward current despite its power dissipation is just 830 mW. It would have the same package of the ones I'd be replacing (SOD-123)
 

click_here

Joined Sep 22, 2020
548
That would be its forward current - i.e. the maximum current if you were using it as a normal diode (anode on the +ve, cathode on the -ve), not as a zener diode.

Unfortunately I don't think that it will work as long as you need 200mA.

If you need a once off hacky solution, glue a through hole next to your pads and solder the wires to it - Otherwise it's version 2 for the PCB
 

Thread Starter

fablau

Joined May 14, 2020
167
That would be its forward current - i.e. the maximum current if you were using it as a normal diode (anode on the +ve, cathode on the -ve), not as a zener diode.

Unfortunately I don't think that it will work as long as you need 200mA.

If you need a once off hacky solution, glue a through hole next to your pads and solder the wires to it - Otherwise it's version 2 for the PCB
Thank you for your reply, now I understand.

Great idea to use a through-hole. Similarly, I think to be able to solder the one you suggested despite being bigger.

Thanks again!
 
Top