Facebook
Google
GitHub
Linkedin
What do you think about this project?
- Thread starter Lore_1147
- Start date
Powered by what? Solar? Mains?
KeithWalker
- Joined Jul 10, 2017
- 3,607
Without more information, I think it's a wish-list.
Exactly, a first post spam.
I think it's a bunch of meaningless technobabble.
MisterBill2
- Joined Jan 23, 2018
- 27,528
OK, it might be high accuracy or high stability, or even "high resolution", but "high precision" is meaningless, although it sounds good to a lot of folks. The display in post #7 has a rather high resolution, as we can see three digits and four digits of displayed values. Accuracy is not so obvious, it will require knowing the actual values to determine accuracy.
Welcome to AAC.
Unfortunately it is impossible to tell what you intend to do from your description. On the one hand, this is mostly a solved problem, with many products on the market incorporating various features you mentioned. On the other hand, you might have a goal that overcomes this objection. Since this device mostly already exists, you will have to explain your motivation in replicating it.
It could be that you just want to build something, and that is the benefit of replication. Or, it could be that you are aware of the current offerings and intend to—in some way—differentiate your version from those. Or, it could be that you want to focus on something like using open source hardware and code. Or… something else.
But, to be able to answer your question about “what we think” you will have to explain how your project will be different than the myriad options already available. What would your weather station do that others can’t? Why is that important? Who is this target user for this device? How will your changes make something worth looking at?
Unfortunately it is impossible to tell what you intend to do from your description. On the one hand, this is mostly a solved problem, with many products on the market incorporating various features you mentioned. On the other hand, you might have a goal that overcomes this objection. Since this device mostly already exists, you will have to explain your motivation in replicating it.
It could be that you just want to build something, and that is the benefit of replication. Or, it could be that you are aware of the current offerings and intend to—in some way—differentiate your version from those. Or, it could be that you want to focus on something like using open source hardware and code. Or… something else.
But, to be able to answer your question about “what we think” you will have to explain how your project will be different than the myriad options already available. What would your weather station do that others can’t? Why is that important? Who is this target user for this device? How will your changes make something worth looking at?
Two things:
First, I think I want to build an electric car (full size, not a model) that runs on a single 9V battery. And can travel thousands of miles on just one battery.
Second, I think this post is nonsense.
Sorry - you asked what I think. We get people coming here just to be heard.
