Awesome !!!!!!!!!! I will definitely take a look at it. Thanks!Hello,
In holland we had the book "jongens radio":
https://www.pe1abr.nl/home-server/pdf/Muiderkring - Jongens Radio_1e_1948.pdf
Bertus
Awesome !!!!!!!!!! I will definitely take a look at it. Thanks!Hello,
In holland we had the book "jongens radio":
https://www.pe1abr.nl/home-server/pdf/Muiderkring - Jongens Radio_1e_1948.pdf
Bertus
There is still something magical about tuning in a signal from the other side of the world. I grew up with an old SW radio beside my bed .... just reliving my childhood. I even still like listening to a crystal radio.Who listens to SW radio these days?
Was this the "cats whisker" type?I use on crystal radio sets. I
My 2C. You will not be happy with that mighty midget radio design. The one I posted above #18 is more more likely to work and you can paint it up to match any thing you like.I wanted to try a tube set for once. This design seemed simple enough.
I agree it would be better but I just wanted to try a tube set .... everything was solid state by the time I grew up.I would l look for a modern JFET based circuit. It would be similar, but without needing 3 supply voltages.
Go for it but with something practical and usable.I agree it would be better but I just wanted to try a tube set .... everything was solid state by the time I grew up.
Ham radio ... say 10 - 160 meters .... Voice of America ... Radio Moscow ... BBC .... Ecuador ... Germany ... I remember as a kid getting all these things on my dad's old tube set ..... hoping there is still something out there to listen to.What radio transmissions do you hope to receive on the short wave bands?
If you have money to invest this is likely the best tube set you can buy. I used these and repaired them in the Military.Ham radio ... say 10 - 160 meters .... Voice of America ... Radio Moscow ... BBC .... Ecuador ... Germany ... I remember as a kid getting all these things on my dad's old tube set ..... hoping there is still something out there to listen to.

Awesome! Thanks so very much for the design !!! It is even simpler than the one I looked at. I did find a vernier drive ($10). Funny you mention code .... I am trying to learn it .... super hard at my age (62) but I am tyring. Thanks !!!!!!It's an old, one tube, regen type receiver. You will be lucky to get a few 1MHz with that design.
A much better design with a 3A4 low voltage surface charge tube: https://www.tubesandmore.com/products/vacuum-tube-3a4-pentode-power-amplifier
https://w5dxs.tripod.com/receiver.htm
For anyone that enjoys old time radio as I do, this is a must do project. This receiver is a simple one tube regenerative type using minimum parts count and low voltages. Although very simple in design it is an excellent performer. The information for this receiver came from the September 1995 issue of CQ, pg. 48, "Red Hot Radio Returns". I made a few changes to the original circuit that really enhanced performance.
Cost of the project was $ 6.00 and a little scrounging in the junk box.
Receiver Circuit Diagram ![]()
My receiver is built in a 4 x 8 inch aluminum chassis. The front panel is 4 inches high. A vernier drive is required for tuning. This is because moving the capacitor a thousandth of an inch will change the frequency. It is very sensitive and must be tuned slowly. The tuning capacitor should have a value of between 90-100 pf. I used the smaller section of a dual gang capacitor from a 5 tube broadcast set having 9 plates. The pot for regeneration adjustment should be 1,000 ohm.
Coil construction is very important as it greatly affects receiver performance. I used a 1 inch o.d. pill bottle for the form and #22 enamel covered wire. This wire is about .016 of an inch in diameter. Both coils are close wound and wound in the same direction. L2 is 7 turns and I made L1 is 22 turns. Coils should have 1/4 inch spacing between them. L1 will affect frequency coverage. Using 22 turns and the tuning capacitor I used gives me a frequency coverage of 3500 kc to 8200 kc. It is important to keep the coil leads under two inches. Using less turns on L1 would raise the frequency. I am happy with my combination because it covers 80 & 40M ham bands as well as much of the popular shortwave broadcast bands. Copying code with this receiver is easy.
Code is easy to learn and easy to forget (the deep mental memory is still there, so you can relearn quickly) if you don't use it.Awesome! Thanks so very much for the design !!! It is even simpler than the one I looked at. I did find a vernier drive ($10). Funny you mention code .... I am trying to learn it .... super hard at my age (62) but I am tyring. Thanks !!!!!!
I actually have that exact radio in storage! It needs a good going over ... I got it from Fair Radio about 40 years ago. When I pull it out of storage, I need to find someone who can go through it. I remember thinks like tuning slugs coming loose. i glued them back (we are talking 30 plus years ago when I knew even less about radio) but I am sure they are not in the right spot. It did work when I put it away but not like it did when I got it. It has been in storage for 20 years. I even have the meters like that one.If you have money to invest this is likely the best tube set you can buy. I used these and repaired them in the Military.
https://www.ebay.com/itm/365515449612?_skw=r+390+receiver&itmmeta=01JS4VYXXFJDQDCAM36Z8GSZ5R&hash=item551a6b250c:g:muwAAOSwWONn0zQ1&itmprp=enc:AQAKAAAA0MHg7L1Zz0LA5DYYmRTS30lSqz2b8DIej1x73JFizstwH/CASLdJDn6cnEViWo5+Thv0aI68KtNj6QOBng1kD0fH1WQRPcOnT+ECouUpZc0+CxenLlGHtScPXv22o2VovdFbqz2GtCk8H1uHtWhWyeAXoS4RRaWpfHXAo4QfJmW2Gzop0OpmrXAeXNgdOWaj3n4GRmTz6QDI7Ib2a+AxtRmiKsRaPN7w4c606QTxcfrtQTXyBdfH3ohmXUFe8hhjtgJlKKVHdbEKjOOsHKa1mYI=|tkp:Bk9SR_De-5vJZQ
View attachment 347415
The R-390A is a general coverage radio receiver capable of receiving amplitude modulated, code, and frequency shift keying signals. Its tuning range is from 500 kHz to 32 MHz, in thirty-two 1 MHz bands. The circuit is the superheterodyne type, double conversion above 8 MHz, below which triple conversion is used. It employs 23 vacuum tubes, a larger than normal count for most general-coverage receivers.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R-390A
Easier for some than others!Code is easy to learn and easy to forget (the deep mental memory is still there, so you can relearn quickly) if you don't use it.
If you don't want it, sell it, because there are people like me who could fix the issues, tune up the slugs (I've re-tuned one after a BOZO idiot screw it up while high on dope).I actually have that exact radio in storage! It needs a good going over ... I got it from Fair Radio about 40 years ago. When I pull it out of storage, I need to find someone who can go through it. I remember thinks like tuning slugs coming loose. i glued them back (we are talking 30 plus years ago when I knew even less about radio) but I am sure they are not in the right spot. It did work when I put it away but not like it did when I got it. It has been in storage for 20 years. I even have the meters like that one.
I needed to pass code tests in order to get my Ham license.Awesome! Thanks so very much for the design !!! It is even simpler than the one I looked at. I did find a vernier drive ($10). Funny you mention code .... I am trying to learn it .... super hard at my age (62) but I am tyring. Thanks !!!!!!
Certainly a lot of responses here. This is about the original topic:: That capacitor, 0.5 mFd, was a paper capacitor, no way an electrolytic cap!! The other components would not be a problem except for the tube and the coils. The TS can wind their own coils "fairly easily", a similar material that could be the right diameter, about 1 1/4 inches.You can still get mica RF capacitors and the other C5 is a old style electrolytic you can still find online.
Self-winding the frontend tuning coils would likely be the best option. Finding old stuff is hit and miss
https://www.rfparts.com/coils-and-c...0jsUnwgbX0uuWWHq3T3ielKkimNtjx-YomhpD4VIUZSMg
1.8MHz to 30 MHz is far too ambitious for this type of receiver.
That is where I found the transformer. Thanks!Hello,
This is my source for old radio parts: https://www.tubesandmore.com/products/radio_antique_equipment_parts_0
OK ... so one person said the .5 was electrolytic and you say it is not. The drawing does not indicate electrolytic but I see in the picture, the cap has a stripe at one end. How can I tell if it is or is not?Certainly a lot of responses here. This is about the original topic:: That capacitor, 0.5 mFd, was a paper capacitor, no way an electrolytic cap!! The other components would not be a problem except for the tube and the coils. The TS can wind their own coils "fairly easily", a similar material that could be the right diameter, about 1 1/4 inches.