That's an interesting idea. One side effect is the erosion of the foundation, which although slow to progress, eventually causes some pretty big problems.Really, there is another solution, if the place is a rental property: The reality is that if the building is being shaken to that extent, structural damage is occurring!! I have first hand experience regarding that!!
another family member moved to a very nice lake-shore house, which had a ground-level laundry room. They also had a washer machine that produced floor vibrations thru-out the house, which caused plaster cracking. They consulted an engineering professional, who verified that the solution was to install pilings to support the washer, as the alternative to continuing additional damage.
SO the TS needs to contact the property manager and complain about the possible structural collapse possibility. THAT concern should provide motivation of those in a position to effect a change. And leave the TS in a safer situation.
Funny you should mention 'moving'. I just moved recently and I can tell you first hand moving is not easy by any measure. One of the hardest things I have had to do in a long time.Of course, if it is a rental, he easy solution is to move.
I think we've gone a little off topic. The desired conclusion is how to gather evidence of the vibrations. While there have been some cheap suggestions, another suggestion would be to get some accelerometers and a data logger. How to gather hard data is what the TS is seeking.I thank you for your suggestions but not really the info I was looking for.
• • • I am looking at the evidence gathering and best ways to get that evidence i.e circuit types parameters etc
That’s for sure. We went from a vibration that is disturbing someone’s sleep to a vibration that is shaking the building down. A bit of a stretch, if you ask me.think we've gone a little off topic
It IS NOT a "stretch" to say it is shaking the building to the point of damage.That’s for sure. We went from a vibration that is disturbing someone’s sleep to a vibration that is shaking the building down. A bit of a stretch, if you ask me.
Would agree. However, the TS wants to know a way to be able to document the shaking so that something positive can be done. It's not a stretch to say smoking can cause lung cancer. But the subject in that case would be "Smoking" and not the ill health affects that can come about from it. Yes, the shaking can be problematic for the structure. I live near the Air Force base and when one hot rod jockey flys over my house he's going making as much noise as he can. While I find it darned impressive, I'm sure the sound waves may one day take its toll, as has happened before elsewhere. Just can't think of that example right now. I also live near a railroad freight line and every day there's some bouncing which can be seen in computer monitors as the image reflected in their screens are obviously bouncing up and down. Will that take a toll on my house? Probably. But probably not for a few generations at a minimum. Unless there's some latent unknown damage to my structure. The trick is to be able to prove the vibrations and likely also quantify the amount of shaking. A bouncing mirror would likely prove there IS shaking going on. But how much shaking is going on? And how much and fast is damage being caused? Move? Yeah, that's an option. But that doesn't answer the question.It IS NOT a "stretch" to say it is shaking the building to the point of damage.
If it is vibrating so badly that the building is at risk of being damaged, why can't the TS get any vibration sensors to even detect it? If vibration sensors can't detect it, what is the likelihood that it will shake a glass of water on the floor sufficiently to make a convincing argument?It IS NOT a "stretch" to say it is shaking the building to the point of damage.
Take a video of the vibration shaking a glass of water on the floor, with a readable clock also in the picture. THAT will verify both the level of vibration and the time it happens.
If it were my problem it might happen that the offender's power somehow gets switched off and on during the vibration.
Hi,If it is vibrating so badly that the building is at risk of being damaged, why can't the TS get any vibration sensors to even detect it? If vibration sensors can't detect it, what is the likelihood that it will shake a glass of water on the floor sufficiently to make a convincing argument?
WE have no hint as to the kind of vibration sensors the TS had access to. There is a huge span of sensitivity ranges among available vibration sensors.If it is vibrating so badly that the building is at risk of being damaged, why can't the TS get any vibration sensors to even detect it? If vibration sensors can't detect it, what is the likelihood that it will shake a glass of water on the floor sufficiently to make a convincing argument?
Two issues with this that I see - the vibration a string could demonstrate would have to be a latitudinal motion whereas a longitudinal motion would need a weight on a spring. The second thing I see is that the length of the string and weight would have to be tuned to the same rate of motion, whether a string or a spring. If you swing a weight back and forth at a faster rate than the weight can move it can be possible to move the hanging point back and forth fast enough that the weight hardly moves. But if you swing it one way slowly then back the other way you can get the weight to swing far more than the motion you put into it.I was able to use a hanging object to show vibrations in the building. A string and some small weight. When the building shakes, the weight starts to swing, and it does not stop swinging right away. WIthout any vibration, there was no swinging at all.