I'm looking into ordering a digital Heisenberg Compensator. Hopefully they'll charge according to my IQ level. Oh, wait, that might not be a good thing. If they see I'm dumb they will up the price.

Trust me, the fact that you're ordering one tells them everything they need to know about your IQ (so be prepared for a huge price tag).

 

I have a used one for sale, if you're interested... I'm upgrading to a newer version

I have a degree of uncertainty about that. Does it come with new or used Tachyon Particles? New particles can extrapolate the uncertainty to less than one grey hair, the used ones are hit and miss.

 

Please stop demonstrating your limited intelligence by propagating the false lie that a so-called "Heisenberg Compensator" is a requirement for a Star Trek style transporter.

Everyone knows that by the year 2265, a complete unified Theory of Everything was not only thoroughly developed, but was routinely taught to advanced middle school students, and completely eliminated the uncertainty of everything. Therefore, no need for a "Compensator".

 

I have a degree of uncertainty about that. Does it come with new or used Tachyon Particles? New particles can extrapolate the uncertainty to less than one grey hair, the used ones are hit and miss.

I don't have a problem with them missing a bunch of grey hairs.

I'd forgotten how bad the acting was in the wretched movie.

 

used Tachyon

Bet the SFO who ordered the used Tachyon's THOUGHT he was getting a good deal. Sometimes used is good. But when it comes to human life - yeah, I'd opt for new every time.

 

@joeyd999

Using your "WayBack" machine again? Say hello to Sherman and Mr. Peabody for me.

(ok, it's official now. I'm old) (funny, I don't look a day over 11 in my picture)

 

I don't have a problem with them missing a bunch of grey hairs.

I'd forgotten how bad the acting was in the wretched movie.

Even when it doesn't turn you into a ham hock, the used ones produce one hell of a hangover.

 

Please stop demonstrating your limited intelligence by propagating the false lie that a so-called "Heisenberg Compensator" is a requirement for a Star Trek style transporter.

Everyone knows that by the year 2265, a complete unified Theory of Everything was not only thoroughly developed, but was routinely taught to advanced middle school students, and completely eliminated the uncertainty of everything. Therefore, no need for a "Compensator".

T.O.E. my big Toe. The T.O.N. is the basis for the "Heisenberg Compensator".

They made a movie about it.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt5667392/

Three scientists discover that nothing can be everything.

 

"The only winning move is not to play"

 

I got them all correct, so the test is not capable of measuring my IQ.

It reported 141, as a male of 65 years.

Bob

 

I got them all correct, so the test is not capable of measuring my IQ.

It reported 141, as a male of 65 years.

Bob

If I had the time (and I don't, so I have to force my self not to indulge) I'd take the test with all correct answers for male/female at a set of ages (perhaps every five years) and plot the results. Then do the same for perhaps 75% and 50%. Perhaps try to map out the IQ=75 floor.

I have a feeling that the plots would reveal a very simple relationship between amongst score, age, and gender.

 

I missed 2. As a man 60. Got 138. You got three more points and I'm 5 years younger. WOW. Mom would be proud of me. I miss her. Now THERE was a woman with an incredible IQ. No idea what hers would rate, but it must have been up there. I tell you, NOBODY could wield a wooden spoon like mom. OUCH!

 

A little late to the game, but took it just for fun.

Wow! Did well on the test and then failed miserably at copying image and link into this post. This forum clearly thinks less of me than the IQ test did.

 

They give the right answer but don't explain why. I have problems with number sequences. Probably partly due to my dyslexia. I always did well in school and the doctors were baffled. I was actually a part of a study as a kid. Best they could figure is that I would see the numbers backward but somehow my brain knew the numbers were backward and corrected the problem. Sometimes I would actually see them switch right in front of me. So when it comes to numbers, part of my brain is occupied correcting what it sees.

I wish they gave the right answer but told you why the answer was right.

 

Completely unsurprising.

View attachment 135116

Where are the hard questions?

Which three did you get wrong?

 

Which three did you get wrong?

Only 150? I thought you would be good for at least 200?

 

Only 150? I thought you would be good for at least 200?

I was just kept testing the system. I had to get down to two wrong to hit 150 so I assumed 140 was 3 wrong.

 

This test looks like a version of the old tickle.com test that was a version of the old emode.com test.

Page scrape of the emode scam.
http://www.dougmoon.com/dougemode.html

 

Some IQ test, I get them all right and get 141, and others get 3 wrong and get 150? Someone should check the IQ of the person who did the scoring algorithm.

Bob

 

Some IQ test, I get them all right and get 141, and others get 3 wrong and get 150? Someone should check the IQ of the person who did the scoring algorithm.

The time you take to answer the questions is also a factor.