In keeping with the thread theme - this was long before an election so not political. A 2005 video.

 

In keeping with the thread theme - this was long before an election so not political. A 2005 video.

Sounds like most old (Mad Men type) guys (and a lot of grown women) talking about women in private with other guys. It''s not PC but who cares.

 

Sound like most old (Mad Men type) guys (and a lot of grown women) talking about women in private with other guys. It''s not PC but who cares.

Too bad he was born 50 years too late. He would have loved being a celebrity in the 1960s Madmen era.

 

Me too.

 

Too bad he was suffering from a debilitating medical issue in the later half of the 1960s. Otherwise I'm sure he would have been making some hay.

 

https://globenewswire.com/news-rele...AN-FORMULATED-PET-WELLNESS-LINE-THERABIS.html

The mission of Therabis is to foster the unconditional love between pets and families, which is grounded in the belief that strengthening that bond enhances the human condition.

The Company intends to bring the remarkable power of hemp to the pet market by combining key cannabinoids with other all-natural ingredients such as hemp powder and zinc, allowing pet owners to address the most uncomfortable of pet health issues with an all-natural solution. All three formulations will come in size and pet-specific pre-measured sachets, which can be added to any food product. Flavored with a blend of all-natural ingredients that has seen almost 100% palatability, the Therabis formulation is designed to deliver benefits from the very first time the product is used.

 

I don't know .... but listening to the banter the past few weeks ... they must be criminal.

But hey, they worked within the "rules of the game".

Personally, I have a double standard. For individuals who must have the public trust, whose activities are expected to be above reproach and are serving the citizens of a country and the world - legal actions which are clearly a broach of the intent of the law or even a broach of civility and civics...

These actions while not illegal in the strictest sense of the word are not illegal, but are certainly deplorable. I will admit, that judgements based on this may be tempered by the culture at the time which they were performed. But a caveat must be applied. Acts of character are timeless.

Other individuals are merely clever.

 

I'm guessing JFK was a deplorable.

 

I'm guessing JFK was a deplorable.

Interestingly, he was also suffering a medical disability in the 1960s. That guy knew how to work through the pain.

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...keys-from-planes-in-arkansas-continues-today/

“We don’t endorse the practice of heaving unsuspecting turkeys out of aircraft for entertainment purposes, but our regulations don’t specifically exclude live animals as ‘objects,'” he said in an email. “State and local animal cruelty laws would cover any alleged abuse.”

I've seen this before.

 

nsa----is that how Colorado gets rid of it's sticks and seeds?

 

What have all the angels on this forum said 11 years ago? Were they nice?

JFK, William Byrd, Teddy K, and a host of others with a D in their affiliation was not exposed for their past nor vilified for it.

Casting stones comes to mind.

 

Hello,

Do you know Liam Martin?
http://www.newnownext.com/liam-martin/07/2014/
http://www.boredpanda.com/he-became-trending-after-these-hilarously-precise-impersonations/

Bertus

 

What have all the angels on this forum said 11 years ago? Were they nice?

JFK, William Byrd, Teddy K, and a host of others with a D in their affiliation was not exposed for their past nor vilified for it.

Casting stones comes to mind.

Agreed, and I hope this will be my only political contribution this season but the difference is that all of those guys actually had the chops to govern. Mr. Trump has not demonstrated that he has any of those chops - this from a lost Republican - so we are left with truly a Hobson's choice

Good luck.

 

I find this interesting....

 

View attachment 113267 I find this interesting....

.
You really don't understand the difference between
A) someone deciding read a book about some a woman who decides to experiment in her own bedroom with a person of her choice
And
B) Having an old man decide he can kiss women or grab someone's crotch when HE Decides simply because he is a "star" and he can do anything?

 

I understand very well. The difference was his was recorded. I'm sure with Facebook, Twitter, and all the other social media as well as movies the language is there.

If that is a defining metric for you ... That's fine with me.

 

I understand very well. The difference was his was recorded. I'm sure with Facebook, Twitter, and all the other social media as well as movies the language is there.

Do you understand what sexual assault is? That DJT described how he grabs women or kisses them uncontrollably?

How is your meme even in the same universe?

 

Eleven years ago some braggart egoistical New Yorker said sometime and it's relevant to you. The statute of limitations has passed.

If there were none, WJCs behavior in the workplace would be prosecuted.

The voters knew in the 1992 election of the Piccadilly s of WJC and still voted for him. They ignored the workplace sexual harassment issues.

 

I like it. I love it. It shows the utter hypocrisy and false morality of the press and political leadership in both partys.

It was the people that voted for Trump, not the press or the partys this time.

Bill got BJs in the oval office and still got re-elected. Hillary sold this nation out for personal gain.......no problem.

Trump brags about lust of ten years ago and he's not qualified or too tainted?

Kindergarten mentality.