Otnael Rocha Silva
- Joined Oct 11, 2015
- 3
Thank you Roman Vladimirovich,already give up to deal with this. I hope you will be helpful
Would you like to make the Wayne protocol available?
Thank you Roman Vladimirovich,already give up to deal with this. I hope you will be helpful
Thank you Roman Vladimirovich,
Would you like to make the Wayne protocol available?
I'm thanking you, because his response helped me.Roman only has 3 posts and has not posted in 3 years. Why are you thanking him for answering a question for ayodejiogundiran three years later?
It’s not that you thanked Roman. I feel that criticism is unfounded. However, the real message here is that one should be aware of the age of threads. Responding to an old post often is an expression of futility. The concern is more for responding with a solution to an inactive thread. Or asking a follow up question in an old thread. In the letter case, starting your own thread is recommended.
But you just wanted to thank someone. In this case, the original poster may never see your comments. No harm, no foul.
Ok, spinnaker!My comment was never meant to be a criticism of gratitude expressed. It was meant at the logic of responding to a 3 year old thread to a user that only has 3 posts and has not been around in 3 years. In addition to that there is something a bit odd about this thread. For some reason it seems to attract a lot of transients. People who come in make one or two posts and never to be seen again. And all about a very obscure subject no less. It is awfully strange.
It looks like just about anyone has the need, but nobody has the required information. I would be for locking this thread.