It’s not that you thanked Roman. I feel that criticism is unfounded. However, the real message here is that one should be aware of the age of threads. Responding to an old post often is an expression of futility. The concern is more for responding with a solution to an inactive thread. Or asking a follow up question in an old thread. In the letter case, starting your own thread is recommended.
But you just wanted to thank someone. In this case, the original poster may never see your comments. No harm, no foul.
Ok, spinnaker!My comment was never meant to be a criticism of gratitude expressed. It was meant at the logic of responding to a 3 year old thread to a user that only has 3 posts and has not been around in 3 years. In addition to that there is something a bit odd about this thread. For some reason it seems to attract a lot of transients. People who come in make one or two posts and never to be seen again. And all about a very obscure subject no less. It is awfully strange.
|Thread starter||Similar threads||Forum||Replies||Date|
|Swapping a 150 mah battery to a 600 mah when charging circuit only 20ma?||Power Electronics||12|
|D||4-20ma control||Analog & Mixed-Signal Design||6|
|issue generating 20mA current.||Homework Help||43|
|K||DAC 4-20mA||General Electronics Chat||6|
|P||Issue on 4-20mA signal,cannot determine where the fault is, as everything seems normal as measured.||General Electronics Chat||19|
by Kate Smith
by Jake Hertz