Thank you for your reply.Are they even compatible? I may be wrong but it seems to me OBD2 uses and interfaces with the CANBuss system and the very old ALDL doesn't even use that system at all, two completely different systems that wouldn't be compatible at all. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On-board_diagnostics
I get what you're saying, thanks for the advice.After my earlier posting I looked into this more. It seems they do make them but it seems like it's more than just two connectors and some wire. Since there seems to be no *universal* adapter that works for all makes, each type of car seems to use something different. Good luck with your project. But if it was me doing it myself would be my last resort. Better to order one and wait rather than blowing up either the cars electronics or the OBD2 tester by not doing things correctly.
Thank you for the link, i've done this before and apparently, there is not any problem. That's why no one can find the problem.Again I may be wrong, since I never worked on or with an Opel. But back when GM cars used that type of port ALDL it used one of the dashboard lights to read the codes. You shorted out two of the pins and watched the light flash to get the code. Not all of the holes in the connector even had terminals in them. It's been many years since I even saw a car with an ALDL in it. Don't know if this will help or not but here is a link to how it was done back when ALDL was still used, hope it helps you - https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/tech-general-engine/241331-pulling-codes-dumbies.html
The idea that the original ALDL flashed a dash light is why I don't think the adapter you want will help you out. A modern OBD1 or OBD2 scanner is looking for something more than a number of pulses that repeat.
Even with or without ALDL or OBD the old time troubleshooting skills still work. The engine needs fuel and ignition to run. And the parts used when ALDL was used are only slightly above the old points and carburetor type engines.
It's an OPEL vectra-A 1994 2.0i j89 5MT engine: 20NE and i have it at least for 8 years.What are the symptoms your having? What model and year is the Opel? Does the engine rottate with the starter? Carburetor or injection? Have you ever seen it run or did you buy it to fix up? Are you getting a spark at the coil wire? I ask that last one because many, many years ago one of my friends did a tune up on his car and it wouldn't start after he got done. When checking things out he had left the distributor rotor out!
That one kind of gives me some pause. I couldn't find that particular engine online but am assuming it is an overhead cam engine. Is it possible that when you heard that noise the timing belt jumped a tooth? With the engine only slightly out of time, not enough to cause valves hitting pistons, it might give the intake valves opening when the injector is firing. Some of the earlier port injection systems used the heat of the intake valves to help both cool the valves and to better atomize the fuel. If the cylinder is getting the fuel out of time and not fully atomized it could cause the plug not to ignite it. Off the top of my head that is the best I can come up with, but will think and look some more. Long distance troubleshooting is hard.But suddenly I heard a spark sound again, that was way louder than the things that i've heard before, maybe like a small cracker. And then the engine went off by itself.
Hi shortbusHi again, well it looks like you've tried all of the correct things. Have you seen this link to a download of the repair manual? http://vlj2011.serveftp.com/912-1006186.html
That one kind of gives me some pause. I couldn't find that particular engine online but am assuming it is an overhead cam engine. Is it possible that when you heard that noise the timing belt jumped a tooth? With the engine only slightly out of time, not enough to cause valves hitting pistons, it might give the intake valves opening when the injector is firing. Some of the earlier port injection systems used the heat of the intake valves to help both cool the valves and to better atomize the fuel. If the cylinder is getting the fuel out of time and not fully atomized it could cause the plug not to ignite it. Off the top of my head that is the best I can come up with, but will think and look some more. Long distance troubleshooting is hard.
When you say there isn't any failure, do you mean you got no check engine light flashes? If that is the case, no flashes at all, you didn't have the correct pins connected. The video you linked to he has a 12 pin connector, the 10 pin one is a different configuration -1. I used the built in diag method of the car that you mentioned earlier, and there is not any failure.
A | B | C | D | E |
K | J | H | G | F |
F | E | D | C | B | A |
G | H | J | K | L | M |
Looks like you checked the gauge sensor, they are in the thermostat part of water flow. The computer temp sensor is usually in the block near the cylinder head area, or sometimes in the cylinder head it's self. This is because the block temp is more consistent to the real engine temperature. Now all of what I'm saying is based on GM American engines, not sure how they do it in the EU.About the temp sensor, no i just checked this one and i don't know where the other one is located.
No, sorry, what i've done is using a paperclip like the way it has been mentioned here. And i had two codes, 12 that means initiation of diagnosis and 31 that means, it didn't get any signal from crankshaft sensor, but it's natural because the engine wasn't running.When you say there isn't any failure, do you mean you got no check engine light flashes? If that is the case, no flashes at all, you didn't have the correct pins connected.
Thanks shortbus, I'll find and check that sensor too. Currently i'm reading about Motronic 1.5 and i've contacted with some companies that produce automotive diagnosis adapters and softwares. I hope i receive some tips from them too.Looks like you checked the gauge sensor, they are in the thermostat part of water flow. The computer temp sensor is usually in the block near the cylinder head area, or sometimes in the cylinder head it's self.
Thank you kindly.I'd like to see you get this running again.
Thank you for your reply @scorbin1.I think the no signal from cranskshaft error may be something to look at. Ive never seen this signal come up on a non-running vehicle in my experience unless there was a problem with the crankshaft sensor.
The 12 is what you should have seen when connecting the correct pins, so your doing it right.And i had two codes, 12
No the codes are recorded and then shown when you access them at a later date. The codes can't even be accessed with the engine running.but it's natural because the engine wasn't running.
I couldn't open the link either, but thought it might have been my computer security stopping me. It does that on some sites.can you open the link?
As I thought more on it, if we were working side by side I would have looked at the fuel pressure regulator and put a gauge on the fuel rail.The volume of the gas is way more than normal, so it won't let the spark plugs to ignite the air/gas mixture.
Yes, I agree. That's the way it is.If the engine starts and just dies do to flooding with fuel, I'd say the crank sensor is good.
How did you open it for the first time?! If you can tell me the name and the publisher i'll search for it.I couldn't open the link either, but thought it might have been my computer security stopping me. It does that on some sites.
I never did open it, I couldn't so I posted a link for you.How did you open it for the first time?!
I haven't seen any video here like that. The only one with injectors is the one that the engine cranks but no fuel comes out of them. Just using a transparent hose to see flow won't tell you if the pressure is correct.As you can see in the video I've opened the fuel rail and used transparent hoses to check the gasoline inlet and outlet flow
by Jake Hertz
by Jake Hertz