why is B not a parallel circuit

Thread Starter

Leikrod

Joined Oct 10, 2017
16
Question 7
Identify which of these circuits is a parallel circuit (there may be more than one shown!):







Circuits D and E are parallel circuits.


Notes:
The purpose of this question is to get students to identify what distinguishing characteristic uniquely identifies a circuit as being “parallel.” Once this has been identified, there are several conclusions which may be deduced (regarding voltage drops, currents, resistances, etc.).

Some students may have difficulty distinguishing that circuit E is a parallel circuit, but it is!
 

Reloadron

Joined Jan 15, 2015
7,889
thanks, so I should assume when people are talking about parallel circuits I should ignore series-parallel?
I would. I see series circuits, I see parallel circuits and I see series parallel circuit so apparently when written they saw it that way.

Hello,

B would be a combinational circuit.
It consists of a parallel part and a series part.

Bertus
Makes sense to me. :)

Ron
 

recklessrog

Joined May 23, 2013
985
I think the question has to be taken in context. As a test question B is series parallel so not just parallel. In real circuits, (schematics) say for instance the power supply feeding a televisions various sections, there would be many parallel components, many series and series parallel components. The skill then is to identify and isolate the building blocks to then identify where in each that you have the different combinations and their effects on each other.
 

Tonyr1084

Joined Sep 24, 2015
9,744
Each circuit is a circuit of its own. Some are series, some are parallel and one (B) is "Series Parallel". The question is "Which circuits are parallel circuits?" The question did not ask which circuits HAVE parallel components to it. B has a parallel component and a series component. And by "Component" I'm not speaking about the resistors I'm speaking about the part of the circuit that is either parallel or series. In B there is a parallel component to it and there's a series component to it. When combined they form an overall singular function.

B HAS a parallel part to it but it is not strictly defined as solely being a parallel circuit.
 

ebp

Joined Feb 8, 2018
2,332
thanks, so I should assume when people are talking about parallel circuits I should ignore series-parallel?
I've been in electronics since that filth Edison was torturing elephants and sundry other animals, and I've never seen any shred of consistency in language for a circuit with parallel parts and series parts.I wouldn't assume anything based on casual language. You can identify which is which, which is what is important.

I run into this when people describe batteries 2S3P for some combination of series and parallel cells. I dislike it because it fails to make explicit if that means three paralleled sets of two cells in series or 2 groups, each of 3 paralleled cells, connected in series. One would the expected config for one type of cell, the other for a different type of cell. Assume nothing.

"combinational" in English is used as an alternative to "combinatorial" and refers to logic (and as opposed to "sequential")
 

Ylli

Joined Nov 13, 2015
1,092
The combination circuits are not considered parallel circuits because...
One of the prime definition of a parallel circuit is that the voltage is the same across all elements.

Conversely, the current is the same in all elements of a series circuit.
 
Top