Quote: "Note the 'old' technique is probably good enough for many things, so the 'new' method is more of an improvement on the old technique"
Mr Al - I like to propose another way for clarifying problems in connection with the subject under discussion:
1.) As you say that the "old techique" (as described in all books and used since decades for teaching electronics) has some weak points, please tell us where this well-proven method (Dc anylysis for DC conditions and AC analysis for dynamic properties like gain) is not acurate enough.
(Quote; "my difference is because i solved for perfect topologies in order to get a more accurate result").
2.) To clarify all misunderstandings about your "new method" it would be best to demonstrate this method in detail (with numbers) using the transistor circuit under discussion.
Thank you and regards
LvW
Mr Al - I like to propose another way for clarifying problems in connection with the subject under discussion:
1.) As you say that the "old techique" (as described in all books and used since decades for teaching electronics) has some weak points, please tell us where this well-proven method (Dc anylysis for DC conditions and AC analysis for dynamic properties like gain) is not acurate enough.
(Quote; "my difference is because i solved for perfect topologies in order to get a more accurate result").
2.) To clarify all misunderstandings about your "new method" it would be best to demonstrate this method in detail (with numbers) using the transistor circuit under discussion.
Thank you and regards
LvW