building hydrogen gen for my old pick up need a curcuit that will only turn on with manual switch but shut down with ignition.

 

hi,
Welcome to AAC.
We need more information regarding the circuit, please post a diagram.
E

 

Do you need to detect actual HV ignition to plugs or just the Voltage from key start/run signal ?


Regards, Dana.

 

How much current is required in the switched circuit?

What electrical power sources are available?

 

If your talking about making a HHO generator for your truck you shouldn't just rely on what Youtube tells you. Your better off spending your money on a tune up for the truck.

 

Water is H2O. Structurally, it can be modeled as H-O-H. When you break it down, it becomes a mixture of H2 and O2, twice as much H2 as O2. There is no such thing as a molecule modeled as H-H-O. Since Hydrogen has only one binding site, it can not bind to two other atoms directly. If these web sites can be so basically in error by telling you a mixture of H2 and O2 is 'HHO', then what other garbage are they trying to get you to believe?

 

need a curcuit that will only turn on with manual switch but shut down with ignition.

Does it need to be turned on with the ignition switch off?

 

Water is H2O. Structurally, it can be modeled as H-O-H. When you break it down, it becomes a mixture of H2 and O2, twice as much H2 as O2. There is no such thing as a molecule modeled as H-H-O. Since Hydrogen has only one binding site, it can not bind to two other atoms directly. If these web sites can be so basically in error by telling you a mixture of H2 and O2 is 'HHO', then what other garbage are they trying to get you to believe?

HHO is the "buzz" word used in Stanley Meyer's scam for efficiency boosting devices (See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanley_Meyer's_water_fuel_cell or search on Meyer + HHO).

 

HHO is the "buzz" word used in Stanley Meyer's scam for efficiency boosting devices (See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanley_Meyer's_water_fuel_cell or search on Meyer + HHO).

I know, but it is still an erroneous description of what comes out when you electrolyze water.

 

I know, but it is still an erroneous description of what comes out when you electrolyze water.

Really? I thought that's how you made expresso.

 

Silly me, I thought that water was HIJKLMNO, (H to O).

 

LMNO is actually a letter all by itself!

 

Silly me, I thought that water was HIJKLMNO, (H to O).

Two of those are not elements.

 

LMNO is actually a letter all by itself!

As in LMNO my dear Watson?

 

O HLMNO!

 

It is amazing that this scam keeps coming up.
When will folks realize it takes a lot more energy to produce the Hydrogen than the motor can get back when it is burnt?
My dad wanted me to add a wind generator to my Prius to top up the battery from the wind produced while driving.

 

It is amazing that this scam keeps coming up.
When will folks realize it takes a lot more energy to produce the Hydrogen than the motor can get back when it is burnt?
My dad wanted me to add a wind generator to my Prius to top up the battery from the wind produced while driving.

This sort of thing qualifies as an overunity topic in my book...

 

How can an old, rusty pick-up be "over unity" with the ignition off? It's the ignition off part that gets me.

 

Water is H2O. Structurally, it can be modeled as H-O-H. When you break it down, it becomes a mixture of H2 and O2, twice as much H2 as O2. There is no such thing as a molecule modeled as H-H-O. Since Hydrogen has only one binding site, it can not bind to two other atoms directly. If these web sites can be so basically in error by telling you a mixture of H2 and O2 is 'HHO', then what other garbage are they trying to get you to believe?

Not where he is getting information from. You would need a very big "generator" to supply enough to make a difference even when idling let alone going down the highway.

If generating hydrogen from water is so good why do industrial gas places make it from a chemical reaction? Or that's the way it was done.

 

Already been there - already disappointed by the results. Lots of work and no rewards.

At best you can get out as much energy as you put into it. But that's in a perfect world. You have to generate electricity to run the reactor. The fuel you extract is proportional to the amount of energy that goes into the reactor. There are losses before the reactor. THEN the gasses you put into the air stream of the intake - they're explosive if you get the concentration high enough to do ANY good for improving gas mileage. Like I said, at best you break even. At worst you can blow the top of your engine off. OK, that's quite extreme. But it's true.

You CAN run your car on hydrogen. BUT you're running hydrogen and mixing it with oxygen. From the point where it's mixed till it's burned is the critical zone. With a reactor like you're thinking of building - the gas is explosive because it's in the perfect mix for a devastating explosion in large enough quantities and it's that way from the moment it's separated into its molecules.

Bottom line, you're not going to improve your mileage. At best, because someone who posted that video is getting paid advertising dollars - you're supporting a charlatan. A liar. You will not see any improvement in mileage, despite what others say or the supposed proof they offer. There's just too many tricks out there. Save yourself time and aggravation and stop now.