Hi guys
I'm just going through my notes here.

My lecturer has gone from this equation to the next - in a single bound!
Now I can see they are equal substituting in a value for beta -I could just learn that and great 100%
But that's not the way my brain works. I have to know the steps in between to see how it forms together.

 

Well, from what I see to get "1" in the numerator you need to divide the numerator by ( 1 + 2/β) , or multiply by the reciprocal . Of course, the denominator also needs to be divided by ( 1 + 2/β ).
But what all of these math manipulations have anything to do with the actual electronics? Do you need to memorize this equation or what?

 

Yeh but what I tend to do to memorize these things, is to actually do it. Piece by piece then if I get stuck I just go through the steps.

 

Legend Jony cheers dude

 

But you can simplify it further.

\[ \beta^{2}(1+\frac{2}{\beta} ) \]
\[ \beta^{2}+\frac{2}{\beta} \cdot \beta^2 \]
\[ \beta^{2}+\frac{2 \beta^2}{\beta} \]
\[ \beta^{2}+\frac{2 \beta \beta}{\beta} \]
\[ \beta^{2}+2 \beta \]


But do you know how the author of a book gets the first (original) equation?

 

Yeh that's a similar form to the way the equation ends up.

But to answer the question - No... I could guess it's some type of backward engineering?

 

Yeh that's a similar form to the way the equation ends up. View attachment 190597

But to answer the question - No... I could guess it's some type of backward engineering?

Maybe it is from this with Iref flowing through R and assuming equal betas for the transistors

 

Hi guys
I'm just going through my notes here.

My lecturer has gone from this equation to the next - in a single bound!
Now I can see they are equal substituting in a value for beta -I could just learn that and great 100%
But that's not the way my brain works. I have to know the steps in between to see how it forms together.

View attachment 190589

Do it like this:

 

Lol Zeeus. That's actually what the circuit is.
However, I think the question Jony was posing, was one of a more philosophical nature

 

Hi,

Well you are given the answer so you can set up two equations and try to figure out what works for both.
One equation comes from the numerator of the first set multiplied by a constant K and the numerator of the answer set and the other equation comes from the denominator of the first set multiplied by a constant K and the denominator of the answer. We end with with these two equations:
K*(2/B+1)=1
K*(2/B+2/B^2+1)=2/((2/B+1)*B^2)+1

Now solve these two for K and get B/(B+2) which is the required factor to get the numerator and denominator of the actual answer.