Edison, Henry Ford and Isaac Newton were three os history's notorious dicks that school teachers praise. I'm sure there are many, many more. "Successful" people are not usually nice people.
Family Guy really hated Edison
No. Looking at their entire body of work definitely should not be required. Requiring a total look implies that they get debits and credits for various areas of their lives. I don't care if they cure cancer, I will still call them a dick if that is how they treat people."Successful" people must be looked at "in toto" prior to passing judgements.
Yes it did. They are included in the "I'm sure there are many, many more" statement. I focused on the first three because I was specifically told by my school teachers that these people should be looked up to and emulated. The two you mentioned were not even in the history books (maybe not even the phone book) at that time.Your list didn't include Bill Gates, Steven Jobs, et al. Were you applying today's metrics to historical figures?
Since Edison had his goon squads burn down Tesla's laboratories....TWICE...he deserves an F- grade.
Family Guy really hated Edison
I fully disagree and find that only people who are self serving dicks think that being thats how they justify much of their negative actions in life."Successful" people must be looked at "in toto" prior to passing judgements.
The thing is even if you do look at all of their life works in almost every case what you will find is their major work they got credit for was still most often primarily based on work and credit they stole or acquired from someone else anyway. If they look like a dick on the surface the odds are they were a dick all the way through.No. Looking at their entire body of work definitely should not be required. Requiring a total look implies that they get debits and credits for various areas of their lives. I don't care if they cure cancer, I will still call them a dick if that is how they treat people.
Do you think Steve Jobs really sat down and invented or designed the stuff in this list of 470 patents?How many actually did any of the work and how many just signed their names on piles of paper in order to take credit for the work that others did until it earned them a name for themselves?
He deserves at least a C for maybe saving Tesla's investors a ton of money on his wireless scams.Since Edison had his goon squads burn down Tesla's laboratories....TWICE...he deserves an F- grade.
No I don't. Contributed in some but took a lot of credit for work others did the majority of.Do you think Steve Jobs really sat down and invented or designed the stuff in this list of 470 patents?
I recall his (unabashedly delivered) mantra, to wit: "Never hesitate to steal a good idea" (With reference to his self-proclaimed theft of the 'GUI concept' from Xerox) -- Whether GUIs (applied to operating systems) were/are a 'good idea' remains debatable -- That Jobs was an eel of the most basal order, however, is indisputable! -- He, more than any other individual, is responsible for the dumbing-down of contemporary technology (from the end-user perspective) and, hence, the all but 'brain dead' status of the general public!Do you think Steve Jobs really sat down and invented or designed the stuff in this list of 470 patents?
Is that statement actually true ? And if it happened, was it proven that those goons were actually sent by Edison?Since Edison had his goon squads burn down Tesla's laboratories....TWICE...he deserves an F- grade.
Unlikely, it's from a movie "The Prestige". Tesla's CS lab was never burned down at all.Is that statement actually true ? And if it happened, was it proven that those goons were actually sent by Edison?
by Robert Keim
by Jake Hertz
by Jeff Child
by Jeff Child