A quick Google search came up with this that may be just what you need.
https://www.robotique.tech/robotics...32-for-remote-weight-monitoring-by-bluetooth/
https://www.robotique.tech/robotics...32-for-remote-weight-monitoring-by-bluetooth/
Because the load cells will be sitting on a violin. The less stuff on it the better.No.
At least I think not.
I may be wrong so I'm looking at the data sheet.
But you will need a micro somewhere to have the data in a format the phone etc. can read, so why not just have an ESP32 serving a WiFi web page?
OK from the beginning. Read Eric's fine post with the data from your load cell. Focus on excitation voltage and sensitivity. These load cells typically output (the green and white leads) 2mv/volt meaning at full scale the output will be 0.002 volt per volt of excitation. Just for example if your load cell full scale is 5 Kg and your excitation voltage is 10 volts your output with 10 kg applied will be 10 * .002 or 20 mV. Really low level. so we amplify that. you have an analog signal proportional to applied force. You amplify it and do the math. Everything here is analog. Before I forget your excitation voltage should be rock stable and again 10 VDC is typical.Hi. I know pretty well nothing about electronics. I connected this load cell to this instrumentation amplifier and expected to see some response from my meter when I put pressure on the load cell. I get nothing at all. Am I doing something wrong? What input instead of the load cell could I use to test the amplifier? Many thanks.

I see a VCO as a Voltage Controlled Oscillator. Should that be the case with a VCO you get a frequency out which is proportional to the force applied to your load cell. That what you want or is your VCO something else. I have a scale which uses a VCO using Voltage to Frequency or VCO.Is there an instrumentation amp that can amplify a 1mV input (or maybe even less) and output volts? i haven't found one. i'm feeding the output into a VCO. edit: sorry the INA125P is doing it's job. I now need work on a more sensitive 555 circuit.
Not from a 555 as a square or rectangular wave is as good as it gets.Next I'll spend some time refining the output of the 555 - maybe a nice clear sinewave would be good.