An observation of seismic activity of lightning sprites atop thunderstorms from the atmosphere boundary layer - as of late.

The increase of volcanic and seismic energy rising into the upper atmosphere boundary layer increasing the ground lighting from the upper atmosphere boundary layer. wind shear then rolling up the energy that is a thin sheet into ball lightning- Sprite's similar to how a tornado is formed. Falling through the atmosphere the gasses adding weight gets pulled apart from the negative and positives holding it together. rotating polarity as it falls to earth pulling it apart. -Sprite Lightning

Discharge into the water vapor in a storm cloud below.

Just something to think about.

 

An observation of seismic activity of lightning sprites atop thunderstorms from the atmosphere boundary layer - as of late.

The increase of volcanic and seismic energy rising into the upper atmosphere boundary layer increasing the ground lighting from the upper atmosphere boundary layer. wind shear then rolling up the energy that is a thin sheet into ball lightning- Sprite's similar to how a tornado is formed. Falling through the atmosphere the gasses adding weight gets pulled apart from the negative and positives holding it together. rotating polarity as it falls to earth pulling it apart. -Sprite Lightning

Discharge into the water vapor in a storm cloud below.

Just something to think about.

And this might be interesting --- because?

 

Science of the world should be everyone's interest
Seismic and volcanic activity's have increased making thunderstorms more veracious.
see -dutchsinseofficial twitch site

 

Science of the world should be everyone's interest
...

Maybe it should be, but I fear that is not the case. Resistance to science education, fact, and discussion are widespread. A great many people believe whatever is comfortable for them without regard to facts or evidence. There is very little general consensus about what constitutes truth. For example, I question the ability of seismic energy to rise into the upper atmosphere boundary layer. Your post seems more like "stream of consciousness" prose than anything remotely resembling a scientific question or scientific analysis.

Maybe it is just the excitement of coming upon new information and you're trying hard to make sense of it.

 

There is no need to post carefully crafted reply's to my post to draw in a mod. I have already done that in a topic of my interest to have the group of mods look over the project. posting in a way to draw out an emotional reply to get the users deleted or band from the forum got old 30 years ago.


have a wonderful day

 

There is no need to post carefully crafted reply's to my post to draw in a mod. I have already done that in a topic of my interest to have the group of mods look over the project. posting in a way to draw out an emotional reply to get the users deleted or band from the forum got old 30 years ago.


have a wonderful day

I don't think your post(s) contain anything that would get you banned. I don't think mine contain anything that would get me banned either. I'm just saying that they lack coherence and readability. Whatever ideas you are trying to communicate or discuss are buried in a pile of nearly undecipherable prose. At least your spelling is accurate.

 

I have posted most of this in a nuclear science forum for years, most are up to speed
Sometimes the accuracy of my spelling is to see what type of person the other poster is.
as I say. have a good day.

 

I have posted most of this in a nuclear science forum for years

Could you explain how nuclear science is relevant to what you are posting here?

 

Please post links to peer reviewed papers on this subject, it sounds interesting. Or, better yet, a college level textbook that covers it.

Bob

 

This is a new guy that has attacked older members here, just because they disagree with him. I have my suspicions of why he joined the forum now. Seems like he may know another member that won't/can't give a reference to his "opinions".
.
.
.
.

 

This is a new guy that has attacked older members here, just because they disagree with him. I have my suspicions of why he joined the forum now. Seems like he may know another member that won't/can't give a reference to his "opinions".
.
.
.
.

If he isn't that member under a different name.

Bob

 

There is no need to post carefully crafted reply's to my post to draw in a mod. I have already done that in a topic of my interest to have the group of mods look over the project. posting in a way to draw out an emotional reply to get the users deleted or band from the forum got old 30 years ago

An effort not to show an intent, quickly dispatching the notion he is anything other than a ‘Troll’ if not he would not have ended it so quickly.

Good day I tell you, Good day. Begone!!!

I say this only to call him back to center stage, bring scholarly documentation or artifacts regarding Conjecture, Theories, Current Studies on the Subject, classroom or otherwise.

Otherwise is rhetorical. (of a question) asked in order to produce an effect or to make a statement rather than to elicit information.

kv

 

I pretty well had him pegged for what he is on his other first post...

 

lightning up from the ground- youtube and how it is created should be of interest to the other project here.
Accumulated -accumulating voltage.

 

The primary for the figure 8 coil, pre-loop each 2nd- 37 times.
Its not a tesla coil.
Take care.

 

Sprite's similar to how a tornado is formed.

I think I have seen that on YouTube a bunch of kids eat a banana then drink a liter of Sprite and that induces projectile vomiting...kind of like a tornado.

 

Still thinking about dissimilar metals with a plastic sheet and a jewel thief to power it so the kick back voltage will not explode like a battery may.

 

Still thinking about dissimilar metals with a plastic sheet and a jewel thief to power it so the kick back voltage will not explode like a battery may.

Reminds me of nonsense jokes.

Q: Why is an orange?

A: A bicycle, because a vest has no sleeves.

 

There seems to be no purpose to this thread, so let's close it and move on.