Hi guys!
According to impedance matching in electronics for getting maximum power from the voltage's source, I'm totally convinced with Zs=ZL , (the circuit is about voltage source connected serial with Zs and Zs connected serial with ZL(ZL is the resistor on the load) ) , whenever I use impedance transformer, why can't I say that I want to match Zs with ZL(ZL is the load) ? we generally are saying we want to match resistor on the load with Zs , but the opposite is also works for this equation Zs=ZL , so we can connected the impedance transformer as "implicitly" the load now is Zs, and Zs exchanged with ZL; i.e now I have ZL connected serial with Zs(Zs is now connected as a load) ... can't I do that conclusion?! maybe because the transformer of impedances are one directional?!
I'm asking because it's weird we always want to match the load to the serial connected resistor and not the vise versa.
According to impedance matching in electronics for getting maximum power from the voltage's source, I'm totally convinced with Zs=ZL , (the circuit is about voltage source connected serial with Zs and Zs connected serial with ZL(ZL is the resistor on the load) ) , whenever I use impedance transformer, why can't I say that I want to match Zs with ZL(ZL is the load) ? we generally are saying we want to match resistor on the load with Zs , but the opposite is also works for this equation Zs=ZL , so we can connected the impedance transformer as "implicitly" the load now is Zs, and Zs exchanged with ZL; i.e now I have ZL connected serial with Zs(Zs is now connected as a load) ... can't I do that conclusion?! maybe because the transformer of impedances are one directional?!
I'm asking because it's weird we always want to match the load to the serial connected resistor and not the vise versa.