That is surprisingly fast for a Nobel prize. It shows how significant they thought the accomplishment was.Weiss, Thorne, and Barish made the discovery as part of the LIGO/VIRGO Collaboration back in February 2016.
That is surprisingly fast for a Nobel prize. It shows how significant they thought the accomplishment was.Weiss, Thorne, and Barish made the discovery as part of the LIGO/VIRGO Collaboration back in February 2016.
The European Space Agency's Fermi Space Telescope detected gamma rays from the merger within two seconds of the gravity waves, indicating the latter travel at the speed of light.
https://www.newscientist.com/articl...have-let-us-see-huge-neutron-stars-colliding/“We’ve got somewhere between a quarter and a third of all the world’s astronomers working with us.”
It marks the first gravitational waves from something other than a black hole binary, the first proof that neutron star mergers can cause gamma ray bursts, the first sighting of heavy elements being formed and the first measurement of the universe’s expansion using gravitational waves.
Now all we have to do is wait a few hundred million years... see what happensAstronomers have found 5 pairs of black holes that are about to merge and may help them understand how the merging of black holes produces powerful gravitational waves.
https://www.space.com/38497-five-me...s-merging-videos.html?utm_source=notification
You've just invented a new genre: "Astro-porn" ...We build the GW telescope and what do we see, couples merging like a roman orgy on a Magic Fingers Vibrating Bed.
https://www.newscientist.com/articl...veries-from-the-hunt-for-gravitational-waves/LIGO researchers say the collision produced somewhere around 10 times the mass of Earth in gold. Similar events may be responsible for most or even all of the heavy elements in the universe.
“We believe that LIGO has failed to make a convincing case for the detection of any gravitational wave event,” says Andrew Jackson, the group’s spokesperson. According to them, the breakthrough was nothing of the sort: it was all an illusion.
Their point, as I understand it, is that they used templates for data comparison. But I too fail to understand what is wrong with that.June of 2017....
http://www.nbi.ku.dk/gravitational-waves/gravitational-waves.html
And August 2017.....
http://www.nbi.ku.dk/gravitational-waves/gravitational-waves-comment2.html
Although I'm not sure what to think of it. Not sure I understand the point.