Falcon Heavy

WBahn

Joined Mar 31, 2012
32,823
I almost gave up after a minute of nothing but the SpaceX logo. Eight minutes of the SpaceX banner was definitely too much. But worth the wait at the end of they day.

Any word on the center core recovery yet?
 

WBahn

Joined Mar 31, 2012
32,823
I want to know how the carry enough fuel to land those boosters without drag chutes.
Since the majority of the weight of the rocket is the fuel, it's actually pretty light coming back down and since they are using the same engines that could lift and accelerate the rocket and it's share of the payload with full fuel, they have power to spare so it only takes a pretty short burn and relatively little fuel. I've looked before trying to find out how much of the total fuel load has to be reserved for recovery, but haven't been able to track down the number.

The penalty that they are paying for the reusability is having to have rockets that are bigger than they would otherwise need to be in order to carry the extra fuel (and the extra weight of the extra cubage associate with it). I don't know how much more powerful the rocket engines needed to be.
 

WBahn

Joined Mar 31, 2012
32,823
The Verge is reporting the core was lost.
That's a shame -- it's always nice to have a clean sweep.

Still a wildly successful launch. I don't know how much additional useful data they will get from the core recovery failure -- some I'm sure -- since they've largely gotten past that hurdle.
 

joeyd999

Joined Jun 6, 2011
6,279
The penalty that they are paying for the reusability is having to have rockets that are bigger than they would otherwise need to be in order to carry the extra fuel (and the extra weight of the extra cubage associate with it). I don't know how much more powerful the rocket engines needed to be.
I suppose the accountants have decided that the extra fuel + heavier rockets + lighter payload < cost of new boosters.
 

WBahn

Joined Mar 31, 2012
32,823
First time in history to hear and watch 2 rockets land in tandem. It was like a star wars movie.
It brought to my mind the reverse of the scene in the movie Armageddon (I think) where they had two simultaneous shuttle launches.
 

Ylli

Joined Nov 13, 2015
1,092
On the core booster.... It was expected to make a three engine landing burn, but only the center engine ignited. Elon indicated 'it ran out of fuel', but those in the know translate that to mean the booster ran out of the chemicals (TEA/TEB) it uses to ignite the engine. If it had actually ran out of fuel, the center engine would have also not fired.

With insufficient braking thrust, the core hit the water at about 300 MPH. Apparently, it did not hit the barge, so no damage there.
 
Top