New Olympic sport: Synchronized Rocketry.
Two out of three ain't bad...The Verge is reporting the core was lost.
Since the majority of the weight of the rocket is the fuel, it's actually pretty light coming back down and since they are using the same engines that could lift and accelerate the rocket and it's share of the payload with full fuel, they have power to spare so it only takes a pretty short burn and relatively little fuel. I've looked before trying to find out how much of the total fuel load has to be reserved for recovery, but haven't been able to track down the number.I want to know how the carry enough fuel to land those boosters without drag chutes.
That's a shame -- it's always nice to have a clean sweep.The Verge is reporting the core was lost.
Talk about sticking the landing! Wow. That’s some good rocket science right there.New Olympic sport: Synchronized Rocketry.
Perfect 10 on the boosters.
I suppose the accountants have decided that the extra fuel + heavier rockets + lighter payload < cost of new boosters.The penalty that they are paying for the reusability is having to have rockets that are bigger than they would otherwise need to be in order to carry the extra fuel (and the extra weight of the extra cubage associate with it). I don't know how much more powerful the rocket engines needed to be.
Just wait till my AG module comes on line. You ain't seen nothing yet.What is cool is that SpaceX now has heavy lift capability.
More like rocket surgery.Talk about sticking the landing! Wow. That’s some good rocket science right there.
It brought to my mind the reverse of the scene in the movie Armageddon (I think) where they had two simultaneous shuttle launches.First time in history to hear and watch 2 rockets land in tandem. It was like a star wars movie.