I guess they aren't smart enough to tell the difference between a proper scientific study and my opinion.
Of course they could check for themselves. But it's so hard.
The preference for a a magazine article over a real study puzzles me. But it's your choice to remain ignorant of the truth.
It doesn't take a mental giant to sit in a smokey bar, breathe deeply and look at the stained walls to determine this is not good for you. Just dumb.

 

I can't comment on all four, but he was right if he questioned the second-hand smoke hysteria. It was bad science and has been debunked long ago.

I think it's like most of the liberal media and general ignorant fools scaremongering tactics.

If something is known to do harm or could do harm at some high level it at any level is therefore equally harmful even if its no where near true and no amount of legitimate scientific study or proof from anyone will sway them.

They have zero capacity to understand or accept the concept of tolerance or exposure level for anything then add on that if they can make a buck sharing other half wits with false information they will without hesitation.

 

If something is known to do harm or could do harm at some high level it at any level is therefore equally harmful...

A.k.a. "risk of a risk".

It's tantamount to a cost/benefit analysis without taking cost into account.

 

A.k.a. "risk of a risk".

It's tantamount to a cost/benefit analysis without taking cost into account.

As my Ex loved to prove. There's no amount of time or money that's too great when it's someone else doing the work and paying for all of it.

 

I think it's like most of the liberal media and general ignorant fools scaremongering tactics.

If something is known to do harm or could do harm at some high level it at any level is therefore equally harmful even if its no where near true and no amount of legitimate scientific study or proof from anyone will sway them.

They have zero capacity to understand or accept the concept of tolerance or exposure level for anything then add on that if they can make a buck sharing other half wits with false information they will without hesitation.

I'll stick with post 761.

 

I'll stick with post 761.

Only because you find no data for post #753

kv

Edit: Nothing to see here.....

 

Only because you find no data for post #753

kv

Edit: Nothing to see here.....

Whats 753 got to do with it? We were talking about second hand smoke.

 

Why are liberals never concerned about the dangers of marijuana smoke?

 

Whats 753 got to do with it? We were talking about second hand smoke.

While in context and narrative of smoke and mirrors which eludes the possible facts outside our scientific pursuits, why is money spent, where?

They look for smoking guns, but the loss is far above the narrative. I have no ROI, show me the money.

kv

 

 

I am beginning to think AGW was created as some kind of cosmic joke. Maybe it should be called Global Trolling.

 

http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2017/05/green-weenie-of-the-week-organic-diets.php

And if you use that much more land for producing food, where are you going to put all the new windmills?

Oh, never underestimate the ingenuity of fools.

 

Whats 753 got to do with it? We were talking about second hand smoke.

He's a Day late and a dollar short, again.

 

http://dailycaller.com/2017/07/05/e...or-nearly-all-of-the-warming-in-climate-data/

 

President Eisenhower was right and wrong in his final warning. It wasn't the military/industrial complex that endangers us. It's the academic/bureaucratic complex that corrupted our government.

This complex serves each other......and both are funded with taxpayer money. But the real price has been the prosperity and freedom of the American working family for the last few decades.

Not to mention......refusing to teach our children who we are......what we've done......and why one should be proud to be an American. This is the worse of their crimes.

They have started to audit the decades data that the EPA uses. Lot's of fraud already. I've read several stories about top universities. It's hard to tell what this will lead to.

 

This is the worse of their crimes.

They have started to audit the decades data that the EPA uses. Lot's of fraud already. I've read several stories about top universities. It's hard to tell what this will lead to.

It will lead to more of what is happening now. People fighting back by getting all the bad players dirty laundry out in the open where everyone who wants to see it can and they can't hide it.

Real legitimate science and fact is cold, hard unapologetic and does not play favorites, no matter how badly anyone tries to report it as such, and above all the truth always leaks out as is to be seen happening now on all levels with much rejoicing at and over it.

 

Right.
It's time to lock down this one.