If enough of us throw our votes away, the oligarchy might present viable candidates in the future.

The only problem with that is Kim Jong Trump would probably win. His true followers are rabid.

 

If enough of us throw our votes away, the oligarchy might present viable candidates in the future.

...or not.

 

If enough of us throw our votes away, the oligarchy might present viable candidates in the future.

Probably not likely to happen as long as money is speech and corporations are people.

 

There's a reason the first amendment is first. Without free speech, all is lost. You don't get to decide – and neither does the government – which people can and cannot support their political choices.

 

Probably not likely to happen as long as money is speech and corporations are people.

So deemed the Supreme Court.

Corporations are people ... they are called shareholders.

 

The only problem with that is Kim Jong Trump would probably win. His true followers are rabid.

Hillary's are not rabid? Haven't you seen the polls? Hillary is a shoe in ... so says the media.

Of course, the only poll that counts is ends in November, on election day. Ohio is voting now. I should be voting in a couple of weeks, and I do vote.

 

So deemed the Supreme Court.

Corporations are people ... they are called shareholders.

Funny, I have never been asked by any of the companies I have investments in if I want to donate to a politician.
So really board members are people. I've never had them ask me either before I had to vote for or against them.
I call:

 

I call:
View attachment 113550

or, maybe...

 

So really board members are people. I've never had them ask me either before I had to vote for or against them.

Did you attend the shareholder's meeting and question them?

 

or, maybe...

Yeah, sorry.
I just think it is funny that Hillary is beating them at their own game. Hundreds of millions in contributions.

 

Your argument is with the Supreme Court. If not them, then it's with your board of directors.

If you have no recourse, pull your money out of them.

 

Did you attend the shareholder's meeting and question them?

Hmm, Good point. I'll try it.

 

Your argument is with the Supreme Court. If not them, then it's with your board of directors.

If you have no recourse, pull your money out of them.

But actually, I'm pretty happy with the results. I just think it's a waste of money. Have you talked to your board members about why they haven't given more to the Donald?

 

Probably not likely to happen as long as money is speech and corporations are people.

I just think this year's candidates are so far from being credible that I don't know whether it's a big joke, a thinly veiled insult to the American people, or an attempt to see if they can act so absurdly that the sheeple will realize they have other choices.

 

It looks like, as in the last election, that PC will decide. Then it was a non-white, now it's a non-male.

 

Then it was a non-white, now it's a non-male

The women got the right to vote in 1920, the 19th amendment. How is that now considered "PC"?

And "minorities" got the "right" to vote in 1965, with the change to the 1870 15th amendment. Again, how is it just now "PC"?

 

It looks like, as in the last election, that PC will decide. Then it was a non-white, now it's a non-male.

That's what happens when you insult a demographic -- they vote for the other party.

 

PC?

 

The women got the right to vote in 1920, the 19th amendment. How is that now considered "PC"?

And "minorities" got the "right" to vote in 1965, with the change to the 1870 15th amendment. Again, how is it just now "PC"?

Maybe he was trying to remember back to his vision of when America was Great.

 

Maybe he was trying to remember back to his vision of when America was Great.

You have uncovered the whole idea behind Kim Jong Trump's slogan.