Which component is this in smps

Ya’akov

Joined Jan 27, 2019
10,226
Welcome to AAC.

Those are diodes, but the only candidate a quick search of markings offers the LUMA140 400V 1A ultrafast rectifier. But given the position, the 1A capacity seems low and the logo is wrong.

In any case, they are diodes.
 

Thread Starter

r.prajapat42

Joined Dec 12, 2023
12
Welcome to AAC.

Those are diodes, but the only candidate a quick search of markings offers the LUMA140 400V 1A ultrafast rectifier. But given the position, the 1A capacity seems low and the logo is wrong.

In any case, they are diodes.
Thanks for guidance.
 

Ya’akov

Joined Jan 27, 2019
10,226
Could you explain this?
It is surmise based on:

Which component is this in an smps just after bridge rectifier.
If the diodes are just after the bridge, it would have to be a <1A supply, and, the size of the diodes suggests >1A rating. It was said concerning the only part I could find that seemed to have similar markings—and those were not a real match (UM41 instead of UM40, and the logos aren’t the same company).

The comment was actually a bit redundant since I was eliminating something I didn’t think was the right part any way.
 

Thread Starter

r.prajapat42

Joined Dec 12, 2023
12
It is surmise based on:



If the diodes are just after the bridge, it would have to be a <1A supply, and, the size of the diodes suggests >1A rating. It was said concerning the only part I could find that seemed to have similar markings—and those were not a real match (UM41 instead of UM40, and the logos aren’t the same company).

The comment was actually a bit redundant since I was eliminating something I didn’t think was the right part any way.
You are right. It may not not be just after bridge, but this is installed nearest to bridge. This is a double layer PCB. In 24 V 10 Amp smps allen Bradley SMPS unit. I have to check again the circuit, i am not too good in electronics good so...
 

Thread Starter

r.prajapat42

Joined Dec 12, 2023
12
It is surmise based on:



If the diodes are just after the bridge, it would have to be a <1A supply, and, the size of the diodes suggests >1A rating. It was said concerning the only part I could find that seemed to have similar markings—and those were not a real match (UM41 instead of UM40, and the logos aren’t the same company).

The comment was actually a bit redundant since I was eliminating something I didn’t think was the right part any way.
Here is image of circuit IMG_20231212_172240.jpgIMG_20231212_172240.jpg
 

BobTPH

Joined Jun 5, 2013
11,463
Those look like they have been replaced (based on the sloppy soldering.). Were probably originally same as the other two next to them.
 

narkeleptk

Joined Mar 11, 2019
586
I dont have much to add but the logo is "General Semiconductor" (now owned by Vishay). UM is the code you need to find the specs in the datasheet. You can ignore the 41 its just production code. I didnt have time to look but its should be easy to search google for it.

diode.jpg
 

Ya’akov

Joined Jan 27, 2019
10,226
I dont have much to add but the logo is "General Semiconductor" (now owned by Vishay). UM is the code you need to find the specs in the datasheet. You can ignore the 41 its just production code. I didnt have time to look but its should be easy to search google for it.

View attachment 309843
In the case of the diode I was discussing, the code for marking was UM followed by 2 digits which denoted capacity. There was no date code. Date codes are certainly a source of confusion for many trying to track down a part and it’s good to know they exist (and usually the second line).

But in the case of parts marking there are many exceptions and no standards for accountability so if the default assumptions fail—though they should be good 80% or more of the time—variations need to be tried.

Thanks for recognizing the logo, I didn’t.
 
Top