What's This Thing that Resembles the Dialer on an Old Phone?

sghioto

Joined Dec 31, 2017
8,633
[QUOTE="johnyradio, post: 2002416,
So it's a screw-hole?
[/QUOTE]
Yes, as seen in the photo in post 3
I don't see any electrical connection to anything else on the board.
Just a fancy screw hole.
 

WBahn

Joined Mar 31, 2012
32,702
[QUOTE="johnyradio, post: 2002416,
So it's a screw-hole?
Yes, as seen in the photo in post 3
I don't see any electrical connection to anything else on the board.
Just a fancy screw hole.
[/QUOTE]

It's probably a stock footprint that they use for a lot of products. On some of them, it's also a high-current electrical connection and/or is for thermal conduction. On this one, it's neither, just a mounting point.
 

Reloadron

Joined Jan 15, 2015
7,850
Is there anything besides resistors on this board? I think resistors alone don't make a voltage detector.
No, just resistors, however, let's look at a description:


Product Description
Description:
This module is based on principle of resistive voltage divider design, can make the red terminal connector input voltage to 5 times smaller.
Arduino analog input voltages up to 5 v, the voltage detection module input voltage not greater than 5Vx5=25V (if using 3.3V systems, input voltage not greater than 3.3Vx5=16.5V).
Arduino AVR chips have 10-bit AD, so this module simulates a resolution of 0.00489V (5V/1023), so the minimum voltage of input voltage detection module is 0.00489Vx5=0.02445V.
Voltage input range: DC0-25 V.
Voltage detection range: DC0.02445 V-25 V.
Voltage analog resolution: 0.00489 V.
Output interface: "+ "connected 5/3.3V, "-" connected GND, "s" connected Arduino AD pins.
DC input interface: red terminal positive with VCC, negative with GND.
Package included:
5* DC 0~25V Voltage Detection Module


Actually it's a 5:1 voltage divider module and not quite a voltage detector. :)

Ron
 

Thread Starter

johnyradio

Joined Oct 26, 2012
615
And, again, you demonstrate that you might be able to work in binary, but that you can't work in any number base.
Hmm....
The phrase "any number base" in the riddle is the final hint that you need to shift your thinking away from the decimal system to find the solution.
- google AI
If this is the explanation, seems pretty weak.
"...and "those who can work in any number base": This is an add-on that adds another layer of cleverness. It introduces a third type of person, suggesting that some people are so skilled in mathematics and computer science that they can think outside the limitations of any one system. This person can see all the possibilities and understand the joke from every angle.
- google AI.
Also weak.
- possibly accurate
 

WBahn

Joined Mar 31, 2012
32,702
Hmm....

If this is the explanation, seems pretty weak.

Also weak.

- possibly accurate
Come on. Think about it.

Clearly, the claim lists three kinds of people.

Clearly, the implication is that most people will likely initially infer that 10 is in decimal (since this is how we automatically interpret '10' in every day life), meaning ten kinds of people, but that will get rejected almost immediately since the list is clearly much shorter than that. Also, we are used to hearing, "there are two kinds of people...." so, with the mention of binary, people will tend to get fixated on '10' being in binary since they expect it to mean two, but will then be unable to break out of that mindset (sound familiar) when they see that there are three categories in the list and then insist that the number must be '11' because it must be in binary.

The huge, glaring hint is that the correct interpretation requires using a number base other than binary.

So, let's see.

If '10' in decimal (a.k.a., base-10) means ten, and if '10' in binary (a.k.a., base-2) means two, can you at least speculate on a number base, k, in which '10' in base-k means three?
 

WBahn

Joined Mar 31, 2012
32,702
Aha, base 3 10 is base 10 3.
Good one.
But the conclusion "you can't work in any number base" is an illogical conclusion.
Illogical or not, it was obviously quite accurate.

Someone that can work in any number base only has to think about that statement for a few seconds to figure out that the '10' in that statement is in base-3.

People that can't work in any number base often had to be led by the nose to see that.
 

Thread Starter

johnyradio

Joined Oct 26, 2012
615
Illogical or not, it was obviously quite accurate.
Illogical conclusion. Someone who is not accustomed to thinking in base systems other than decimal won't recognize 10 as binary. That does not therefore mean that they are incapable of learning to work with binary.
 
Last edited:
Top