What? The spa?

The farm and the spa.

 

Who turned out the lights?

https://outage.ant.isi.edu/?zoom=6&...1&splash=0&poi_scale=3&ddown=dtli,-73.0,-37.0

 

Being stupid.
https://www.kktv.com/2025/02/28/air...ortedly-admit-cheating-facilitating-cheating/

AIR FORCE ACADEMY, Colo. (KKTV) - The U.S. Air Force Academy said it was investigating possible violations of the Honor Code during a weekly knowledge test after almost 100 cadets admitted to cheating or tolerating cheating.

 

Banks ...
Citigroup mistakenly credits customer account $81 trillion in "near miss", FT reports | Reuters

Feb 28 (Reuters) - Citigroup (C.N), erroneously credited $81 trillion, instead of $280, to a customer's account and took hours to reverse the transaction, a "near miss" that shows up the bank's operational issues it has sought to fix, the Financial Times reported on Friday.

 

Damn. Member of the local Slavic (non-Russian) community. Outsiders don't usually mess with those guys as they are tight.

 

"if you hear it, it wasn't for you"

 

 

​

 

 

​

 

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/a...e_caught_up_to_mike_rowe_now_what_152485.html

 

Mess around and find out.

Kids, take it to a motel, not in some poor slobs single-wide trailer.

 

​

 

The New York Times? You gotta be joking!

(and it's not even April 1, yet)

 

The New York Times? You gotta be joking!

(and it's not even April 1, yet)

To this day, there is no strong scientific evidence ruling out a lab leak or proving that the virus arose from human-animal contact in that seafood market. The few papers cited for market origin were written by a small, overlapping group of authors, including those who didn’t tell the public how serious their doubts had been.

No strong (IMO there is presently strong scientific evidence but that statement in the opinion post above means there is scientific evidence) vs ZERO, NONE, NADA scientific evidence of a lab leak being the origin event. What we have in the opinion post is personal bias of a predetermined target, China. I don't trust China, period but there is NO scientific evidence of a lab leak.

 

What we have in the opinion post is personal bias of a predetermined target, China.

In the New York Times (was my point) .

The Times, they are a changin', it would seem.

Go figure.

 

The Times, they are a changin', it would seem.

https://instapundit.com/708677/

 

In the New York Times (was my point) .

The Times, they are a changin', it would seem.

Go figure.

It's just a opinion post. They occasionally have done that for about the last 100 plus years.

 

It's just a opinion post. They occasionally have done that for about the last 100 plus years.

Completely out of character. Such an opinion would never have been published in the NYT prior to this year.

They would have had a mutiny on their hands, worse than the Tom Cotton fiasco a few years ago.

 

Completely out of character. Such an opinion would never have been published in the NYT prior to this year.

They would have had a mutiny on their hands, worse than the Tom Cotton fiasco a few years ago.

BFD is my answer about any opinion post from any news publication. It's called a newspaper and I still read it occasionally for real news and facts, not anyone's personal feelings or opinions.