First, let me say how much I appreciate having this resource available online! I've always classified electricity in the "and then magic happens" category, much like cars (despite being an engineer - I'm civil and environmental) but a recent interest in home-generated power has me Googling up a storm to find sources of data more practical/intuitive than my long-neglected college Physics text. This site is FANTASTIC - thank you! I particularly appreciate the DC chapter on Safety, which I found oddly reassuring, as now I know what/where the issues are instead of just stumbling around blindly responding with "Ack! Don't touch it! It's electrical! You could DIE!".
I have come across a few typos or vocabulary issues that I thought you might be interested in addressing. Thank you for all the hard work, and for making this publication so accessible!
Stacy McKenna Seip
-------------------------------------------
http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/vol_1/chpt_1/2.html
"To be more precise, it could be called dynamic electricity in contrast to static electricity, which is an unmoving accumulation of electric charge."
This implies that static electricity is not capable of moving, which isn't true. Static charge can (and often is) transferred between objects while both maintain a static charge (for example, taking a sphere charged off a Van Degraaf generator, removing it from the generator, and using it to charge another sphere - static charge has been transferred/moved [they're now both at half the original sphere's charge] and still have a static charge. The "static" refers to a "separation of charge", not whether or not the charged particles can move.
http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/vol_1/chpt_3/4.html
"it is advisable to only use on hand to work on live circuits"
should read "one hand"
http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/vol_1/chpt_4/1.html
"However, what if the car actually did weight 3,000 pounds,"
should read "weigh"
http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/vol_1/chpt_8/3.html
"The laboratory scale balance beam doesn't actually weight anything;"
should read "weigh"
http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/vol_1/chpt_8/4.html
"a shunt resistor could be placed between those points and left their permanently"
should read "and left there"
http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/vol_1/chpt_9/5.html
"We simply cannot spare to have even a single millivolt of drop along the conductor lengths without incurring serious temperature measurement errors."
should this read "we simply can not bear/afford"?
http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/vol_1/chpt_10/3.html
neither of the hyperlinks to "octav", "spi", "dvn", or "aef" worked for me. Have octav, dvn, or aef been previously mentioned?
http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/vol_1/chpt_10/4.html
Again, links to octav and spi bring up nothing.
http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/vol_1/chpt_16/4.html
"For a series LR circuit,"
Everywhere else uses "L/R" - was this a typo, or is there an intentional distinction?
I have come across a few typos or vocabulary issues that I thought you might be interested in addressing. Thank you for all the hard work, and for making this publication so accessible!
Stacy McKenna Seip
-------------------------------------------
http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/vol_1/chpt_1/2.html
"To be more precise, it could be called dynamic electricity in contrast to static electricity, which is an unmoving accumulation of electric charge."
This implies that static electricity is not capable of moving, which isn't true. Static charge can (and often is) transferred between objects while both maintain a static charge (for example, taking a sphere charged off a Van Degraaf generator, removing it from the generator, and using it to charge another sphere - static charge has been transferred/moved [they're now both at half the original sphere's charge] and still have a static charge. The "static" refers to a "separation of charge", not whether or not the charged particles can move.
http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/vol_1/chpt_3/4.html
"it is advisable to only use on hand to work on live circuits"
should read "one hand"
http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/vol_1/chpt_4/1.html
"However, what if the car actually did weight 3,000 pounds,"
should read "weigh"
http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/vol_1/chpt_8/3.html
"The laboratory scale balance beam doesn't actually weight anything;"
should read "weigh"
http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/vol_1/chpt_8/4.html
"a shunt resistor could be placed between those points and left their permanently"
should read "and left there"
http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/vol_1/chpt_9/5.html
"We simply cannot spare to have even a single millivolt of drop along the conductor lengths without incurring serious temperature measurement errors."
should this read "we simply can not bear/afford"?
http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/vol_1/chpt_10/3.html
neither of the hyperlinks to "octav", "spi", "dvn", or "aef" worked for me. Have octav, dvn, or aef been previously mentioned?
http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/vol_1/chpt_10/4.html
Again, links to octav and spi bring up nothing.
http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/vol_1/chpt_16/4.html
"For a series LR circuit,"
Everywhere else uses "L/R" - was this a typo, or is there an intentional distinction?