Need solar roof top solar system equipment, But i don,t know the cost of those equipment. Any one can help me for that ?
FWIW, in the U.S. the total installed cost for residential solar is about $3/watt.A good rule of thumb is for a solar panel, one watt is one dollar. But there is other equipment that will bring the cost up. What exactly do you need?
Hmmm. At $3/W and with energy (around here) being about $0.12/kWh, that means that the system has a payback period of about 25,000 hours of operation. I don't know what a reasonable effective time per day is, but I suspect it isn't much above five hours (at least around here). So even ignoring lost days that's 5,000 days or pushing 14 years.FWIW, in the U.S. the total installed cost for residential solar is about $3/watt.
Some data for the U.S.:
https://news.energysage.com/how-much-does-the-average-solar-panel-installation-cost-in-the-u-s/
I think it’s all about niches for now. Solar can make great sense if you’re far off grid (perhaps on an island), get lots of sun, get government incentives and so on. None of that applies to me and I have cheap electricity to boot, maybe about $0.05 per kWh on average. My payback time exceeds the likely service life. I suppose that’s true for many and in fact Tesla appears to be bailing out of residential solar and turning focus to larger installations.Hmmm. At $3/W and with energy (around here) being about $0.12/kWh, that means that the system has a payback period of about 25,000 hours of operation. I don't know what a reasonable effective time per day is, but I suspect it isn't much above five hours (at least around here). So even ignoring lost days that's 5,000 days or pushing 14 years.
I've seen claims that the payback period is 6 to 8 years, so my 14 year estimate isn't completely out of whack. Our utility rates are usually a bit below the national average.
Another way of looking at it is that, if the 5 hr/day figure is reasonable, then each W of panel produces something like 0.15 kWh/month, or 1.8 kWh/yr. For us, that's a return of about 22 cents a year on a $3 investment, or 7.2%. Not a bad return, but not great either. Weighing against it is that the $3 is largely a sunk cost. If I invest $3 in the market and it returns 7.2%, then after some amount of time I not only have whatever the returns are, but I still have the principle. With a solar panel I don't have the $3 but, rather, a heavily used solar panel that may or may not have much value, especially in comparison to state of the art panels at that time.
Still, I think that it is probably in the realm that non-economic factors, such as knowing that you have (more or less) stable power available can be allowed to swing the decision.
it's not that easy. it;s easy to have one or the other with failsafe interlocks. By failsafe, they are mechanically interlocked so both cannot be on at the same time. You can use a breaker and back feed a power panel as long as the main break and the backfed breaker are mechanically interlocked.There is mandatory relays that disconnect from the power pole to not electrocute utility workers fixing an outage, and keep solar energy in the dwelling.