Schematic for a 3 channel analog audio mixer

Thread Starter

freeflyer

Joined Sep 9, 2016
169
Ive rebuilt the circuit on strip board instead of breadboard, but the LM4871 is still very quiet yet the PAM8302A is louder but there is a hum (there is also hum on the LM4871). I tried powering from a power bank to rule out switching noise, but the hum is still there.

So I am now looking at alternative solutions.

Amplifier:
https://uk.rs-online.com/web/p/analogue-development-tools/1360830
- uses LM48100Q-Q amplifier (class D ?)
- mono output but has 2 inputs (left and right channels)
- both inputs can be mixed and each input has gain control using I2C, so no need for the summing op-amp

Speaker:
https://uk.rs-online.com/web/p/miniature-speakers/2596151
- Same Sky 1.5W Miniature Speaker
- 8 ohm

Will this give me better results ?

I am really struggling with the audio/amp part of this project and its a road block to completing the project, so if I cant get an amplifer and speaker working (which I thought would be straight forward) then Ill have to give up
 

ci139

Joined Jul 11, 2016
2,006
(you likely are aware that speaker impedance does not unarily define the share of E converted into sound pressure)
have you tested different headphones sets (?)
 

Thread Starter

freeflyer

Joined Sep 9, 2016
169

ci139

Joined Jul 11, 2016
2,006
just, a stupid thought -- do you have an "on board" output filter = the speaker membrane has a mass and mechanical inertia ? when you HF juggle it around ?? the dynamic range may have an impact . . . maybe . . .
 

MisterBill2

Joined Jan 23, 2018
27,720
I have been wondering and now I am finally asking : WHY put the audio signals into the non-inverting input, along with the DC bias??? The other posted TYPICAL circuits have them separate. Bias fed into the non-inverting side, and the signals, along with the feedback, into the inverting input. There are reasons for that and they make a lot of sense.
 

AnalogKid

Joined Aug 1, 2013
12,174
Agree. A non-inverting summer stage has less isolation among the inputs. Also, the through gain decreases as the number of inputs increases unless you adjust the summing resistor values. There is a case where that is a good thing, but the vast majority of summing amplifier applications I've seen have an inverting summer, either preceded by inverting input stages or followed with an inverting output stage to preserve signal polarity.

ak
 

Thread Starter

freeflyer

Joined Sep 9, 2016
169
I have been wondering and now I am finally asking : WHY put the audio signals into the non-inverting input, along with the DC bias??? The other posted TYPICAL circuits have them separate. Bias fed into the non-inverting side, and the signals, along with the feedback, into the inverting input. There are reasons for that and they make a lot of sense.
If I put them in the inverting input, wouldnt I need a bipolar supply (negative and positive) ? As it will be powered from a 1S LiPo battery, I would need a DCDC to generate a bipolar supply.
 

crutschow

Joined Mar 14, 2008
38,572
If I put them in the inverting input, wouldnt I need a bipolar supply (negative and positive) ? As it will be powered from a 1S LiPo battery, I would need a DCDC to generate a bipolar supply.
No.
The LM4871 is internally biased to operate from a single supply when the input(s) are connected to the inverting input through a capacitor.
 

MisterBill2

Joined Jan 23, 2018
27,720
If I put them in the inverting input, wouldnt I need a bipolar supply (negative and positive) ? As it will be powered from a 1S LiPo battery, I would need a DCDC to generate a bipolar supply.
NO, you do not need a bipolar supply, because your design already biases the output to 1/2 Vcc. That should have been obvious. AND, that bias is needed no matter which input is used, for single supply operation.
 
Top