ok i send with this massage my design file
i enable the power pins and 2 number at the ic has been shwon but still dont know what to do
the picture is this
but still have an erorr at the pspice
the nodes adress and the erorr is this
**** INCLUDING adfsfad-SCHEMATIC1.net ****
* source ADFSFAD
V_V1 N00277 0 5Vdc
V_V2 N00313 0 5Vdc
R_R2 0 N01096 1k
i enable the power pins and 2 number at the ic has been shwon but still dont know what to do
the picture is this
but still have an erorr at the pspice
the nodes adress and the erorr is this
**** INCLUDING adfsfad-SCHEMATIC1.net ****
* source ADFSFAD
V_V1 N00277 0 5Vdc
V_V2 N00313 0 5Vdc
R_R2 0 N01096 1k
hi m550,
I do not use Spice, but I have found this link for the 4066
Do you know how to create a Spice model from a file.?
If not, check online for guidance.
E
Most ICs have a wide range of specs listed in their datasheets. Some have good specs and others with the same part number have poor and different specs.
A simulation program usually shows only devices the "typical" specs then if you build a circuit that works fine in a simulation it might not work or work poorly with purchased devices that have different specs.
Your very low 5V supply voltage and a very low 1k load resistor shows on a graph in the datasheet working very poorly with a device that has "typical" specs. When turned on a device with typical specs cuts the signal to half the level of the 5V input.
With a 10k or 100k load the graph shows it working better but still poorly with a 5V supply.
Another graph shows a 10V supply and the CD4016 working poorly with a 1k load and working fairly well with a 10k or 100k load.
Since a simulation program does not read datasheets then you must calculate how devices that you purchase with different than "typical" specs will perform.
A newer and more powerful CD4066 works better than a CD4016. Compare their datasheets.