Privacy lost...

WBahn

Joined Mar 31, 2012
32,993
While the fine details weren't disclosed, it seems like the approach that was used in the case in question was pretty reasonable. They asked for anonymized information about phones that were within a pretty small area within a pretty small time window. I don't know if either of those could have reasonably been made smaller as I don't know the granularity of the location data that is retained. They then worked with that anonymized data to narrow things down further (that's what would be far more interesting to see) and eventually asked for the identifying information for only three individuals. That strikes me as a pretty focused approach that respected privacy rights on par with normal investigative techniques -- investigators routinely start with much larger pools of potential suspects, by name, and do considerably more intrusive digging in order to winnow the list down.

I'm far more concerned about broader data surveillance and pattern analysis.

Shifting gears, it reinforces the notion that many/most people that commit crimes are far from criminal masterminds. You are going to rob a bank, yet you are going to carry your cellphone with you while you do it? Then again, how many folks have gotten caught because they posted selfies of themselves on public social media accounts showing off the items they stole?
 
Top