Can anyone help me find equivalent components to the transistor BC548? I've been searching since days ago, no luck.
BC848Can anyone help me find equivalent components to the transistor BC548? I've been searching since days ago, no luck.
I want to build a board the smaller as possible.BC848
. . . buy why do you need equivalents when you can easily buy BC548s?
https://www.rapidonline.com/Catalogue/Search?Query=BC548
and BC546 and BC547 are the same thing graded for higher voltage.
Thanks, I'll look into it.
I've checked the SMD equivalents from that article, all of them have way smaller power and frequency. Is it ok to use them anyway?
Yes - if you don't need the extra power dissipation. The ft value will probably vary with the mid-band hfe, which can vary from 110 to 800 over the different grades, so the difference between the two datasheets is irrelevant.I've checked the SMD equivalents from that article, all of them have way smaller power and frequency. Is it ok to use them anyway?
Well didn't you work out how much power dissipation you needed?It's for this project.
You mean BC848?Well didn't you work out how much power dissipation you needed?
If you need to save space, you can get double versions (BCM848)
https://assets.nexperia.com/documents/data-sheet/BCM847DS.pdfYou mean BC848?
A higher voltage shouldn't be a problem, right? I mean, isn't a higher voltage just an indicative that the component can support a higher voltage, instead of always working at a higher voltage?https://assets.nexperia.com/documents/data-sheet/BCM847DS.pdf
(but it's only available as the higher voltage version)
It just indicates that it will withstand a higher voltage.A higher voltage shouldn't be a problem, right? I mean, isn't a higher voltage just an indicative that the component can support a higher voltage, instead of always working at a higher voltage?
I don't know, the original BC548 has a frequency of 300mhz, that one has a frequency of 100mhz, 3 times lower.How about this one from Digikey
https://assets.nexperia.com/documents/data-sheet/BC856-Q_BC857-Q_BC858-Q.pdf
:emojithinking:It just indicates that it will withstand a higher voltage.
Fairchild datasheets used to tell you the "process" that the transistors came from. BC546, BC547, BC548 and BC549 all came from the same process. Maybe they came from the same dice, and are just selected for voltage, or maybe they use higher resistivity silicon for the higher voltage devices. (Someone on this forum will know).
If it is higher resistivity silicon, then it means that the saturation voltage is likely to be slightly higher.
Why is that parameter important to you in your application?I don't know, the original BC548 has a frequency of 300mhz, that one has a frequency of 100mhz, 3 times lower.
:emojithinking:
I'm checking that one, but there's also a list that I created and would like to consider.Why is that parameter important to you in your application?
https://diotec.com/request/datasheet/bc846.pdf
You want the BC849C
You've done the hard part, now you tell us.I'm checking that one, but there's also a list that I created and would like to consider.
First the non-SMD ones with the original values:
https://alltransistors.com/adv/pdfview.php?doc=bc546_bc547_bc548.pdf&dire=_motorola
Now the list of the SMD versions:
https://alltransistors.com/transistor.php?transistor=23613
https://alltransistors.com/transistor.php?transistor=70670
https://alltransistors.com/transistor.php?transistor=23606
https://alltransistors.com/transistor.php?transistor=64821
https://alltransistors.com/transistor.php?transistor=23615
https://alltransistors.com/pdfview-s.php?doc=bc846alt&dire=05
https://alltransistors.com/pdfview-s.php?doc=bc846w&dire=05
https://alltransistors.com/pdfview-s.php?doc=bc846t_847t_series_3&dire=05
https://alltransistors.com/pdfview-s.php?doc=bc846awt&dire=05
https://alltransistors.com/pdfview-s.php?doc=bc846_847_3&dire=05
https://alltransistors.com/pdfview-s.php?doc=bc846_sam&dire=05
https://alltransistors.com/transistor.php?transistor=23407
https://alltransistors.com/transistor.php?transistor=23674
Which ones have closer values to the BC546 (or BC548)?