Photodiode : Spectral Range Vs Wavelength

Discussion in 'General Electronics Chat' started by odm4286, Jul 30, 2016.

1. odm4286 Thread Starter Active Member

Sep 20, 2009
155
5
Hello everyone, I'm putting together a BOM for my next project. It involves detecting light emitted from a 650nm laser diode. I'm a little confused on the spectral range and wavelength attributes of photodiodes. Should I ensure the spectral range of my photodiode covers the wavelength of my laser diode? Or, do I need to match the wavelength of the photodiode with the wavelength of my laser diode. Thanks!

2. jpanhalt AAC Fanatic!

Jan 18, 2008
5,699
910
What is the difference? The range of wavelengths detected by the photodiode will not be nearly as narrow as the wavelength spectrum produced by the laser. All you need is a photodiode that will respond to the laser wavelength.

John

odm4286 likes this.
3. odm4286 Thread Starter Active Member

Sep 20, 2009
155
5
Hmm, on digkey there is a photodiode that has a wavelength of 580nm but a spectral range of 330nm - 720nm. Is it safe to assume spectral range is just another way of saying "detection range"?

4. jpanhalt AAC Fanatic!

Jan 18, 2008
5,699
910
The sensitivity of photodiodes varies with wavelength. It is not necessarily a simple geometric curve. In any event, the photodiode will give some response within that stated range. If one needs to accurately measure the photons, then there are ways to calibrate the photodiode for a particular wavelength. I do not think photon counting is in the TS's plan.

John

odm4286 likes this.
5. DickCappels Moderator

Aug 21, 2008
3,221
807
Below is the sensitivity curve of the Rohm BH1680FVC-TR. Its peak sensitivity is 530 nm, but notice that ots sensitivity is down only 20% at 650 nm. Something with a response like this should work fine with your laser.

odm4286 likes this.

Apr 5, 2008
16,429
2,695
Hello,

Hamamatsu has some nice PDF's about the subject of si photodiodes.

Bertus

File size:
7.9 MB
Views:
4
• Hamamatsu_selection_guide_si_pd_kspd0001e.pdf
File size:
3.7 MB
Views:
1
odm4286 likes this.
7. Papabravo Expert

Feb 24, 2006
10,694
1,983
I would say that since spectral response is given as a ratio you could compute the 3 dB down points as follows:

$-3 = 10 \times log(\text ratio)$
$10^{-0.3}\approx 0.5$

Says me any ratio above 0.5 should be good or 450 nm to 700 nm

Last edited: Jul 31, 2016
odm4286 likes this.
8. hp1729 Well-Known Member

Nov 23, 2015
2,309
279
650 nm is red? Do you expect interference with normal lighting?
.

9. odm4286 Thread Starter Active Member

Sep 20, 2009
155
5
Haven't put much thought into it, this is mostly a learning exercise at the moment. I do not have any experience with laserdiodes or photodiodes. Should I anticipate some false positives due to ambient light?

10. Papabravo Expert

Feb 24, 2006
10,694
1,983
The photodiode response will be proportional to the power applied to the area. I think you will find that the laser diode has a much higher intensity than the ambient background. If you want you can place the photodiode at the end of a opaque black tube which will limit the range of incidence angles of the impinging light.

11. DickCappels Moderator

Aug 21, 2008
3,221
807
Maybe. There are many techniques to reduce interference from ambient light. Optical bandpass limiting might help some in this case, restricting the field of view of the receiver, pulse coding or pulse modulation so that the signal out of the detector can be detected after passing through a bandpass or pulse matching filter, but since you are planning to use a laser diode, your best bet might be just to reduce the receiver's sensitivity and take advantage of the fact (?) that the intensity of the laser beam is stronger than any ambient light falling on the sensor.

My preferred method when there is interference so to switch the LED (in my case,) on and off at several KHz, bandpass the output signal and then detect the signal, followed by a filter.