Electricity prices in Europe are going negative - and that's bad
View attachment 325138
​

Paywall.

 

Is their nothing CAGW can't do?

 

If they have, they've done it quietly. Those who follow this know. Not so much the general virtue-signaling public.

I suppose it's more accurate to say industry insiders have spoken out if not the industry itself. PBS and NPR have been all over it. I wouldn't normally quote them as a source but they present plenty of evidence.

https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/...ry-insiders-reveal-the-truth-about-recycling/

 

This tall statement seems to negate everything I've learned about chemistry.

Take a look at the various reports from PBS and NPR on the topic. I remember distinctly hearing industry insiders put it more-or-less the way I wrote it.
https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/...ry-insiders-reveal-the-truth-about-recycling/
https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/documentary/plastic-wars/

 

NYT, so probably fake, but here it is anyway:

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/27/briefing/maldives-atolls-climate-change.html

"If, say, the ice sheets melted faster than expected, then sea-level rise could accelerate sharply."

Must....keep....the....narrative....alive.

 

"If, say, the ice sheets melted faster than expected, then sea-level rise could accelerate sharply."
Must....keep....the....narrative....alive.

That's hardly a scientifically meaningful rebuttal. Many of the climate change doomsayers are in fact educated and competent scientists in the traditional sense of the word. They understand their problem domain, they often have excellent mathematics and so on. If you don't like the message don't shoot the messenger.

 

Source: The Guardian

 

Can you believe it?

New Yorkers are forced to buy trendy window AC units on account of CAGW.

Is there nothing CAGW can't do?

 

In other (commodity related) news...

https://www.livescience.com/planet-...sota-has-mind-bogglingly-large-concentrations

This is a good thing for those of us who enjoy party balloons.

https://www.livescience.com/planet-...even-bigger-more-concentrated-than-we-thought

 

 

Until she stops using the word "denier", I'll consider her a quack like all the rest, at least with regards to CAGW.

 

Wow.

After 75 years of CAGW induced sea level rise, the beach is still exactly where it was.

 

Nevermind the paywall, the headline pretty much says it all.
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2024/06/26/climate/maldives-islands-climate-change.html

"Low-lying tropical island nations were expected to be early victims of rising seas. But research tells a surprising story: Many islands are stable. Some have even grown."

A pretty surprising admission, given the source.

 

More:
https://thediplomat.com/2024/08/the-maldives-might-not-be-sinking-after-all/

 

 

Hypocrites.

 

Hypocrites.

Maybe not...

 

Boy, it was getting chilly in here!



Thank you, Man Kind, for averting what could have been a climatological catastrophe.

 

As Helene bears down on North Florida, let's all remember that it's our fault.

We wouldn't have to deal with severe weather if we'd only just stop oil.

 

https://www.yahoo.com/news/exxon-mobil-says-advanced-recycling-100018708.html?guccounter=1
Exxon Mobil says advanced recycling is the answer to plastic waste. But is it really?

But despite its seemingly eco-friendly name, the attorney general's lawsuit denounced advanced recycling as a "public relations stunt" that largely involves superheating plastics to convert them into fuel. At Exxon Mobil's only "advanced recycling" facility in Baytown, Texas, only 8% of plastic is remade into new material, while the remaining 92% is processed into fuel that is later burned.