Caramel,i'm probably completely off, but would Vo=20/27 Volts?
It will be helpful if you can post the steps you used to arrive at the above answer. That way it will be easier to follow your line of thought in arriving at your answer.
hgmjr
Caramel,i'm probably completely off, but would Vo=20/27 Volts?
http://nothingbutnode.freehostia.com/knightofsolamnus ... what is your website?
i do understand virtual ground, this is my second circuits course.. regarding the cricuit, i'm sorry i guess i used the wrong word.. i meant to say i'd like to see how the first circuit was re-drawn/transformed to your circuit.And you said, There is no simplification. The redrawn circuit is identical to the original circuit.
i reviewed it now, it's completely wrong, no use of posting itCaramel,
It will be helpful if you can post the steps you used to arrive at the above answer. That way it will be easier to follow your line of thought in arriving at your answer.
hgmjr
caramel,so lets see, for Vo = 20/27 V:
eq1: Vo = Vp + 4Vs/9
and
eq2: Vp = 2Vs/3 ==> 0Vo + Vp = 2Vs/3 ==> 0Vo = -Vp + 2Vs/3
eq2/eq1 ==> Vs = 2/3 Volts
and Vo = 10Vs/9 = (10/9)(2/3) = 20/27 Volts
i'd like to see how the first circuit was re-drawn/transformed to your circuit.
caramel,wow! lol.. we haven't had Millman's Thm yet, but i see you got the same answer i did, so i guess all is good....... she used to always specify if she wanted us to solve using variables only, don't know why she didn't here!
anyway, thanks so much.. i really appreciate your efforts, hgmjr.. and thanks to everyone else who helped, especially Ron H for providing the easier-to-work-with circuit.. you guys/ladies are life-savers