Need help IDing component

Thread Starter

Kennzx91

Joined Oct 26, 2015
2
IMAG0082.jpg I am currently working on a machine at work and the creep control stopped working. Pulled apart the controller and this is what I found. Company that built it wants 2K to rebuild it and it would have a 45 day turn around. All that is labeled is "15A" it's a light green with a black stripe. Any help would be much appreciated.
 

Attachments

#12

Joined Nov 30, 2010
18,224
That looks like what we called a, "green dot diode" in 1970. A 1N4004 would be the substitute...but I'm not sure.
 

ian field

Joined Oct 27, 2012
6,536
View attachment 93575 I am currently working on a machine at work and the creep control stopped working. Pulled apart the controller and this is what I found. Company that built it wants 2K to rebuild it and it would have a 45 day turn around. All that is labeled is "15A" it's a light green with a black stripe. Any help would be much appreciated.
I'd take it out and clean up what looks like corrosion so I could measure it for any clues it might give up.

The lead diameter might be the easiest clue to current rating that can be compared to "typical" device data sheets.

Those glass-bead types are frequently fast recovery type - but there's no absolute rule to that, they could just as easily be standard speed.

You can't rule out the possibility of it being a zener.
 

#12

Joined Nov 30, 2010
18,224
Last edited:

ian field

Joined Oct 27, 2012
6,536
I had a little extra time before I got off work and got it out. But it came out in 3 pieces... -_- Buttttt I was able to get a full part number off of the one I pulled out. A15A.
Did a quick search and came up with this :
http://www.electronicsurplus.com/general-electric-a15a-diode-3amp-100v

It's a 12 volt system. 100v seems a little over kill?
AFAIK: the usual spike protection devices for automotive are at least 68V. If your board doesn't have any of those - 100V may not be enough.

The NTE cross reference comes back as a 3A 100V standard recovery diode.

A 1N5401 would meet the specification, but I'd go for at least a 5402.
 

PackratKing

Joined Jul 13, 2008
847
In a situation as you face, in repairing something like this... Once you determine what caused the component to fail to begin with... Overkill in the replacement part is easily justified...

It appears as this part failed in normal operational cycling fatigue in the circuit, as there is no other local evidence of scorching or shortcircuit...
2K to repair their product smells like a lucrative scam.
 

ian field

Joined Oct 27, 2012
6,536
In a situation as you face, in repairing something like this... Once you determine what caused the component to fail to begin with... Overkill in the replacement part is easily justified...

It appears as this part failed in normal operational cycling fatigue in the circuit, as there is no other local evidence of scorching or shortcircuit...
2K to repair their product smells like a lucrative scam.
If I'd designed that - the bends wouldn't be so close to the diode encapsulation. Those glass bead diodes are usually pretty robust, but it can depend who made it.

AFAIK: there are 1N540x clones available in the glass bead style, but I'd form the leads on the replacement so they extend out further and loop back to match the holes - a 1N540x in standard plastic package won't fit unless that is done.
 
Top