yep. I wasted a lot of time trying to move imaginary quantities of money around, and kept losing track.$100.
Oh yeah, and how much did the $30 devalue due to inflation while she was inside? And is the point at which she left even really where we should draw the line? He could still be losing money as we speak!Depends.
What was the cost price of the $70 worth of goods?
If the cost price is $0 then the owner has lost $30.
If the woman had $70, It is unlikely she would steel money to buy fruit.What would the owner have lost if the woman hadn't stolen the money, but instead just came in with her own money and bought $70 worth of goods and left with the goods and the $30 in change?
Nothing -- it was a normal transaction.
That transaction is independent of the prior act of theft.
Irrelevant noise in so many ways. First, it has nothing to do with the problem, and second, there are lots of people who steal who have no need to. They even have a clinical name for them.If the woman had $70, It is unlikely she would steel money to buy fruit.
Note that that clinical term is usually applied to steeling objects, not money. She didn't steal the fruit. Also, clinically diagnosed people usually steal things they don't need. Stealing food or money usually called shoplifting or robbery and those are not clinical diagnoses.Irrelevant noise in so many ways. First, it has nothing to do with the problem, and second, there are lots of people who steal who have no need to. They even have a clinical name for them.
More irrelevant noise. Unless you are somehow claiming that the amount the shopowner lost is now dependent on whether the woman wanted the money, needed the money, felt compelled to take the money, or just likes stealing money.Note that that clinical term is usually applied to steeling objects, not money. She didn't steal the fruit. Also, clinically diagnosed people usually steal things they want instead of need. Stealing food is usually called shoplifting and that is not a clinical diagnosis.
Sentence fragment...Unless you are somehow claiming that the amount the shopowner lost is now dependent on whether the woman wanted the money, needed the money, felt compelled to take the money, or just likes stealing money.
Think really hard. I'm betting even you can figure it out. Meanwhile, I'm once again done with your trolling and baiting.Sentence fragment...
I'm not sure where you were going with this one. Should I wait for your follow up tweet?
Note: you are no longer limited to 140 characters.
by Aaron Carman
by Jake Hertz
by Jake Hertz
by Duane Benson