I read a "technical" article about alternatives to lithium batteries. The article contained the phrase...
The only focus of the article was, I guess, CREATING lithium is more difficult than another element. No word about recharging efficiency (over voltage), energy density, number of recharge cycles, - it was just "content" hoping to feed an SEO algorithm. The article contained no useful information - the "author" only recompiled a hand-waving press release and added phrasing that suggests alchemy is real.
How can we improve the quality of our middle-school science courses? I'd be willing to pay more taxes so people that passed real science courses can be offered a competitive salary.
Lithium, which is found in most batteries in some form, is broken down from hard rock and brine deposits and can be created by mixing a few chemicals and minerals.
The only focus of the article was, I guess, CREATING lithium is more difficult than another element. No word about recharging efficiency (over voltage), energy density, number of recharge cycles, - it was just "content" hoping to feed an SEO algorithm. The article contained no useful information - the "author" only recompiled a hand-waving press release and added phrasing that suggests alchemy is real.
How can we improve the quality of our middle-school science courses? I'd be willing to pay more taxes so people that passed real science courses can be offered a competitive salary.