If you have some 680Ω resistors, just keep adding another in series.MrChips
I don't have so many Resistors values, I should buy some potentiometers to try, but yes I have a larger value R to turn it on.
If you have some 680Ω resistors, just keep adding another in series.MrChips
I don't have so many Resistors values, I should buy some potentiometers to try, but yes I have a larger value R to turn it on.
Just stating your assumptions should be sufficient. When I was in school, we used 1.4V for LEDs; now I use 2V if color isn't specified.I think it's starting to make sense although consfusing, and let's asume I didn't have a circuit, led datasheet, and a meter, just a exam paper with a schematic, a pencil and a calculator, there we will need an ideal led to solve it right?
Correct.Okay guys I did again the circuit with different resistors values, now R1 = 680omhs and R2 = 2.2Komhs, led remains the same warm white, without the Led multimeter measured 2.76V in the resistor divider, when plugged the Led into bread board the voltage sag to 2.53V, this is confuse tbh but yeah that's how the Vfw Led works.
When you say an ideal Led you mean a perfect Led on paper with a exact Vfw at what it will turn on?
I was reading the Thevenin's theorem, but haven't made a calculation yet.
WBanh
I understand the calculations you did there now, so according to the measures my meter did when led is connected, 3.6V-2.53V = 1.07V, so 1.07V across R1, this will allow a current throught R1 of 1.07V/680ohms = 1.573mA, since V across Led is 2.53v for R2 is the same 2.53V/2.2Kohms = 1.15mA, 1.573mA-1.15mA = 0.423mA left and that goes to the led.
Then you need to make assumptions. The basic assumptions back in the day were the following:I think it's starting to make sense although consfusing, and let's asume I didn't have a circuit, led datasheet, and a meter, just a exam paper with a schematic, a pencil and a calculator, there we will need an ideal led to solve it right?
When we design circuits, we take tolerances into account. Normally I'd use 5% tolerance resistors, but will use 1% when necessary. I've also cherry picked parts, but that's not a good design philosophy.So guys when solving pure schematics the results are just an aproximation, compared to when you build the circuit as there could be some variations due components like resistors, capacitors and inductors
For people not able to troubleshoot problems caused by counterfeit parts, they should always buy from reputable sources (i.e. not Amazon, eBay, AliExpress, and the like). The same goes for people who don't want to waste their time on defective/counterfeit parts.So okay it is better to buy components from trustable sites as digikey, arrow, mouser and lcsc, because they provide the part number, plus they save you time because they also provide schematics in the product page.
MOSFETs have replaced BJTs in most designs. They're now fast enough, cheap enough, and can handle sufficient power. That wasn't always the case. Try looking for a reasonably priced P channel MOSFET in through hole. For N channel, there's 2N7000 for about a dime each in quantity 100. Try to find a P channel for that price.I was watching that transistors and mosfets do something similar, but transistors are controlled with current at the Base and mosfets with voltage at the Gate, can you give me some examples when is better to use each one?
Blue LEDs were invented in the early 1990s, but took quite a while to commercialize and get them to price points that were economically viable for many types of applications. The inventor got the 2014 Nobel Prize for their work.Man this is so cool, I had not idea that in the beging there weren't white leds, are you talking about 80's, 90's? I just read 3 years ago to use 2.2V for red and orange and 3V for blue and white.
Almost all circuit analysis, whether by hand or by a simulator, involves approximations. Real devices are very complex. Even a simple resistor not only has a tolerance to its resistance, but its resistance changes with temperature and other factors. It is also usually modeled as a device that has a constant resistance as a function of voltage and current, but this is not the case. First off, it will heat up, which changes the temperature, which changes the resistance. But, even if it is held at constant temperature, the resistance of virtually all materials is not such that current is strictly proportional to voltage -- they are non-ohmic to some degree.So guys when solving pure schematics the results are just an aproximation, compared to when you build the circuit as there could be some variations due components like resistors, capacitors and inductors I see they are sold with tolerances normally from 10%-30%, and 1%-5% are generally more expensive?
You definitely want to buy from reputable sights if you need to have parts that you can have confidence in. For a lot of hobby work, this isn't the case. So if you can get components at 1/10 the cost from Bob's Electronic Parts and All-night Video Rental, then if half of them are bad, you are money ahead. You've wasted time, effort, and frustration in figuring out which parts are good and which aren't, but if that is worth the cost-savings to you, it's a smart decision. For a lot of us, this was the mode we were in at the beginning. We were poor students and so scrounging parts, including resistors, off of circuit boards from equipment found in a dumpster was worth it because we couldn't afford to buy real parts. At some point, many of us reached a point where our time was more valuable to us than the savings, and so we paid DigiKey's and Mouser's outrageous prices without any hesitation because we knew they were virtually guaranteed to have what we wanted in stock, to be willing to sell it in unit quantities, and be willing to ship it the same day. But I still know people that scrounge from scrap circuit boards, even after 50 or 60 years in electronics.So okay it is better to buy components from trustable sites as digikey, arrow, mouser and lcsc, because they provide the part number, plus they save you time because they also provide schematics in the product page.
BJTs are most properly considered voltage controlled devices. But for a huge fraction of designs, it is reasonable to treat them as current-controlled devices. While you can always perform the analysis using a voltage-controlled model, there are lots of circuits that simply can't be analyzed properly without treating it as voltage-controlled.I was watching that transistors and mosfets do something similar, but transistors are controlled with current at the Base and mosfets with voltage at the Gate, can you give me some examples when is better to use each one?