LDO Design help needed

Thread Starter

mishra87

Joined Jan 17, 2016
1,034
Hi All,
I want to design power supply for below specification.
Could you please share your thought ?
Input : 12V-13.5V
Output : 5V or 3.3V
Current : 100mA

Case 1 : Output 5V@100mA, Power Dissipation(max) = (13.5-5)*100mA = 850mW
Case2 : Output 3.3V@100mA, Power Dissipation(max) = (13.5-3.3)*100mA = 1.02W

So both case1 and case considering the cost factor which is the best option - Linear regulator (LDO) or Buck Converter ?
Do i need heatsink in case linear regulator design ? Not sure if LDO is available to dissipate 1W power.

Thanks !
 

ericgibbs

Joined Jan 29, 2010
18,845
hi mish87,
Why do you want LDO with those relatively high input voltages, ie:12V ..13,5V down to 5V or 3.3V.?
E
EG57_ 671.png
 

Attachments

Last edited:

StefanZe

Joined Nov 6, 2019
191
Hi,
A 7805 in a TO220 has a thermal resistance of about 50°C/W. 1W power dissipation will heat it up to 50°C over the ambient temperature. At an ambient temperature of 40°C the IC will have 90°C. This will not destroy the IC but will reduce the lifetime of it. You can dissipate the heat better with a heat sink, but this will add to your cost.

The linear regulator is cheaper (without the heatsink) than the buck regulator.

It depends on your project which one is better.
 

Thread Starter

mishra87

Joined Jan 17, 2016
1,034
hi mish87,
Why do you want LDO with those relatively high input voltages, ie:12V ..13,5V down to 5V or 3.3V.?
E
View attachment 289121
Hey ericgibbs,
I am exploring here what could be the best option and still not decided.
Only the tradeoff between LDO and Buck are cost. If choose LDO + heatsink so more or less cost would be same as LDO.
Thanks!
 

Thread Starter

mishra87

Joined Jan 17, 2016
1,034
Hi,
A 7805 in a TO220 has a thermal resistance of about 50°C/W. 1W power dissipation will heat it up to 50°C over the ambient temperature. At an ambient temperature of 40°C the IC will have 90°C. This will not destroy the IC but will reduce the lifetime of it. You can dissipate the heat better with a heat sink, but this will add to your cost.

The linear regulator is cheaper (without the heatsink) than the buck regulator.

It depends on your project which one is better.
Hey,
Thanks for very good insight !
My ambient is 105degC.

Regards
 

ericgibbs

Joined Jan 29, 2010
18,845
Hi mish,
OK. As you are designing a power supply, I would also consider a variable regulator, such as the LM317.
Fit heat sinks and use some form of current limiting.

E
 

Thread Starter

mishra87

Joined Jan 17, 2016
1,034
Hi mish,
OK. As you are designing a power supply, I would also consider a variable regulator, such as the LM317.
Fit heat sinks and use some form of current limiting.

E
Hi E,
Do you think LM317 with Heatsink will be less costlier than a buck for 100mA current ?
Thanks
 

Juhahoo

Joined Jun 3, 2019
302
Depends on your specifications, what do you require?

Should it be:
cheapest solution?
high efficiency > low heat generation?
overall size?
Low EMC and high output purity?

Overall best performance you get with the BUCK regulator, no worries of heat and relatively simple to set up.
 

ericgibbs

Joined Jan 29, 2010
18,845
Hi mish,
The reason I am suggesting a LM317, it will give you an option to set a voltage other than 5v or 3.3v.
eg: say you needed 9Vdc voltage to check a motor or a device requiring 1.5v, it would be possible.

Use the AM1117 types fixed 5v and 3.3v , but in addition a variable supply from a LM317.
E
 

BobTPH

Joined Jun 5, 2013
8,942
If the ambient temp is really 105C, a linear regulator is probably out of the question. You would likely need a cooling fan.
 
Top