And why that value?
@Audioguru again
@Audioguru again
But it's a balanced line, so it's driven by TWO 300Ω resistors.>620Ω║18KΩ=599.4Ω
If you need to tweak it test select the 18KΩ.
Or 1k2||1k2 = 600R![]()
In that case, I'd agree with 2 x 1.2k in parallel, because that gains the greatest benefit of resistors in parallel decreasing error due to tolerance, and also good for stockholding!My comment was referring to the inaccuracy of the 620||18k, rather than the application of the thread
No matter how many digits a calculator spits out, that still is a +/-5% tolerance value.620Ω║18KΩ=599.4Ω
If you need to tweak it test select the 18KΩ.
Paralleling resistor can yield almost any value, IMO you don't need specialty resistors.
Professional audio inputs are generally 10k unbalanced or 20k balanced.No matter how many digits a calculator spits out, that still is a +/-5% tolerance value.
Better to use one 604 ohm resistor at an input, and two 301 ohm resistors at a balanced output.
ak
Agreed. The vast majority of professional audio equipment is designed with "bridged" impedances, with the source Z significantly lower than the load Z. The old 600-ohm impedance matched connections hasn't been a thing for many decades.Professional audio inputs are generally 10k unbalanced or 20k balanced.
Yes. Why introduce a 6dB loss when you don't have to? And that means that it is no longer essential for output impedances to be exactly 600Ω.Agreed. The vast majority of professional audio equipment is designed with "bridged" impedances, with the source Z significantly lower than the load Z. The old 600-ohm impedance matched connections hasn't been a thing for many decades.
by Aaron Carman
by Duane Benson
by Aaron Carman