Simply add 14 feet of wire to the signal path.But still curious if you guys have any ideas on how to simply add a 15 ns second delay somehow
Wouldn't it be closer to 10 feet (I'm assuming a velocity factor of 2/3, which may be too low for loose wire).Simply add 14 feet of wire to the signal path.
ak
That would be a VOP of 93%11"/ns is stuck in my head from somewhere...
ak
Sorry was MIA all dayHow many different transmitters might a given receiver be able to see?
Those are only about 1/6 of a decade apart, so filtering them might me challenging, particularly if you are doing it in analog. If you sample it fast enough you can implement a pretty high order filter digitally. So you might be better off using an RX module that has the high-order built in but that doesn't process the signal beyond that. I think such modules exist (I think some of the previous recommendations are probably of that type).Sorry was MIA all day
RX can only see one of two potential TX. 38khz and 56 kHz
as far as I'm aware the filtering is built in. Also the traditional RX such as the TSSP4038 is only sensitive to about +- 50 hz or so.Those are only about 1/6 of a decade apart, so filtering them might me challenging, particularly if you are doing it in analog. If you sample it fast enough you can implement a pretty high order filter digitally. So you might be better off using an RX module that has the high-order built in but that doesn't process the signal beyond that. I think such modules exist (I think some of the previous recommendations are probably of that type).
Something like this perhapsI'm still not sure how you are using this delay.
Could you sketch something shows what you want the waveforms to look like, including this delay?
At 38 kHz, a 15 ns delay represents a shift of about 0.05% of the period. Your waveform jitter probably swamps that, so how is this going to help you?
Yes my apologiesIt sounds like you are gating the signal.
What is the "delay" -- a delay means to make something appear later than is otherwise would. What you show above isn't delaying anything -- it is outright suppressing some of the pulses.
And you talked about a 15 ns delay. Where did that 15 ns number come from?
Are you using this IR signal to transfer data, or is the goal merely to detect that it is present?
If the latter, then all you need to do is gate it (using the circuit you show above) with a suitable squarewave signal so that the receiver is seeing bursts -- as long as the receiver is designed to respond to such bursts instead of ignoring them as noise.
"Gate" basically means to turn on and turn off under the control of a signal.Yes my apologies
Not a delay it needs to be suppressed for a certain time to break the signal
The goal is just to detect its present. No data transfer required.
I have heard the term "gate it" before but don't know what it means
I thought of using an and gate but i don't know how to drive the other side of the and gate. I have nothing to trigger the other side of the and gate which is why i just wrote trigger in the picture because I'm not really sure how to trigger it
Any ideas on a simple way to do that?
That will depend on the receiver you are using. You need to craft a waveform that it will respond adequately to. Ideally, you can find one that will respond suitably to a string of pulse bursts.Yes i understand that
Recall many posts ago i said i could do this with an tiny 85 MCU very easy
I am just trying to keep it discrete parts
So say i wanted to gate it
How would i calculate the frequency i need from the 555 timer to suppress for a certain time?