Lately I have been observing a sharp increase in my oldest daughter's tendency to try and dominate her younger sister. She will withold toys or candies or whatever the younger one wants, not because she wants the thing, but just to solidify her perceived rank in whatever pecking order she thinks exists around here.
I have tried to call her out on it (deliberately taking something she didn't really want, just send a point) but she denies it and complains "But it's my toy and I haven't had a chance to play with it at all today." Or "But it's just it's the last tootsie roll and I only got to have 2 and she got like 10." It's hard to rebut her rebuttal because I think she actually believes it. I don't think she consciously withholds from the younger one or picks on the younger one with the idea "yeah, now you know whose the alpha female around here, so fall in line peon!" I think it's just something we subconsciously do as humans, and so do animals.
I sat down with her last night and we watched this video about the complicated hierarchy and dominant/alpha behavior of Java monkeys. I paused several times to discuss, translate everything into terms of "more awesome monkey," "less awesome monkey," "loser monkey," "boss monkey," etc. and assess her understanding of animal nature and alpha behavior. We had a real good chat following the blurb starting @ 9:15. Afterwards I reiterated what the video said in the beginning about how we are so closely related to monkeys and how we share much of the same instincts and nature as monkeys. But then I expounded about how what sets people apart from the animal kingdom is self control. We have the ability and the duty as citizens of the world to consciously suppress some of our undesirable natural behavioral traits. Like eating the faces off of people that upset us for example. People who senselessly murder other people, are not people; they are animals.
I told her that one day when she grows up and enters the world she will have no choice but play along in the dominance game, and she will have to prove herself. She will have to work for, fight for, and defend her position in life. But for now, as a kid living at home with her parents, she does not, and should not try to. I told her "Your sister does not have a boss's boss's boss's boss. She only has a boss, and her boss is your boss too, and that's me. Your sister is not the loser monkey. You are not the more awesome monkey. You are not a monkey at all, you are a person, and as a person, you need to be aware of your behavior and take control of it." Afterwards, she did admit to have been acting like the monkeys in the video lately. She said she understood and would stop; we will see. She did really good today, but it's only been one day.
After our little chat though, I have been thinking a lot about this dominance topic. I see it much more clearly now, in everything, where for my whole life until now it has been just a universally understood part of life and not something I paid any conscious attention to. Dominance plays into just about everything we do, all day, every day. On the way into work today you probably got cut off, and it probably pissed you off, because someone just dominated you. Someone just forced you into submission, made you their bitch. You probably don't think that consciously. You, like me, may have on occasion pondered why it's so infuriating. You probably calked it up to "they're so inconsiderate" or "they just put me danger." But that isn't it. You don't want to admit it, but the real reason you got so hot under the collar is because you were just exposed as a big weak bitch in front of the whole highway audience. That's the whole reason behind road rage; some people just can't take it. That guy who cut you off probably showed up to work feeling like a million bucks and talked down to one coworker and made sexual passes at another, feeding off the conquest of his AM commute. When you got to work, you probably met the work day already in a crabby mood and called your boss "sir," further solidifying yourself as a member of the loser monkey club. Then you picked the fleas out of your boss's boss's neck fur. Or, maybe you're the guy who cut the loser monkey off and then had rough sex with your loser monkey secretary when she came in to bring you your starbucks.
In either case it doesn't really matter; the point is, unless you do it in the middle of the night, you can't even gas up your car without being dominated or dominating someone else. "No, I got here first" - it doesn't even need to be said out loud; body language says it all. Or, "Oh, you look like you're in a hurry, go ahead I can wait." - same deal.
But is it really an entirely bad aspect of human/animal nature? That's the part I can't decide. On the one hand it does seem pretty barbaric on the surface, but on the other hand I could argue that without dominance and competition (or are they the same thing?), we would have never left the caves. I could argue that it is our perpetual quest to always be better than everyone else that has brought us from sharp rocks and hot rocks to blenders and microwaves. I could argue that our self-imposed pecking order is what enabled the strongest and the smartest of us to mate with the strongest and smartest of us, resulting in a species that is unsurpassed in its achievements.
But when I apply that logic back to the monkeys, the wheels fall off. They've been biting each other's tails off for eons and they're still just biting each other's tails off. Does their complicated genealogical caste system really serve them to the degree of effort they put into it? Does the group really benefit as a whole by having one super awesome money who gets to bitch-slap whoever he wants, and a few lesser awesome monkeys beneath him who can sit on whatever log they want, regardless of who was sitting there previously? Does the majority of the loser monkeys benefit from having to fetch food for the more awesome monkeys? I don't see where a group of class-equal monkeys would have any lesser chance of success in the wild. But, they are just monkeys. I do not expect their behavior to make sense.
But I do expect us humans' behavior to make sense. Do you think our behavior makes sense?
I have tried to call her out on it (deliberately taking something she didn't really want, just send a point) but she denies it and complains "But it's my toy and I haven't had a chance to play with it at all today." Or "But it's just it's the last tootsie roll and I only got to have 2 and she got like 10." It's hard to rebut her rebuttal because I think she actually believes it. I don't think she consciously withholds from the younger one or picks on the younger one with the idea "yeah, now you know whose the alpha female around here, so fall in line peon!" I think it's just something we subconsciously do as humans, and so do animals.
I sat down with her last night and we watched this video about the complicated hierarchy and dominant/alpha behavior of Java monkeys. I paused several times to discuss, translate everything into terms of "more awesome monkey," "less awesome monkey," "loser monkey," "boss monkey," etc. and assess her understanding of animal nature and alpha behavior. We had a real good chat following the blurb starting @ 9:15. Afterwards I reiterated what the video said in the beginning about how we are so closely related to monkeys and how we share much of the same instincts and nature as monkeys. But then I expounded about how what sets people apart from the animal kingdom is self control. We have the ability and the duty as citizens of the world to consciously suppress some of our undesirable natural behavioral traits. Like eating the faces off of people that upset us for example. People who senselessly murder other people, are not people; they are animals.
I told her that one day when she grows up and enters the world she will have no choice but play along in the dominance game, and she will have to prove herself. She will have to work for, fight for, and defend her position in life. But for now, as a kid living at home with her parents, she does not, and should not try to. I told her "Your sister does not have a boss's boss's boss's boss. She only has a boss, and her boss is your boss too, and that's me. Your sister is not the loser monkey. You are not the more awesome monkey. You are not a monkey at all, you are a person, and as a person, you need to be aware of your behavior and take control of it." Afterwards, she did admit to have been acting like the monkeys in the video lately. She said she understood and would stop; we will see. She did really good today, but it's only been one day.
After our little chat though, I have been thinking a lot about this dominance topic. I see it much more clearly now, in everything, where for my whole life until now it has been just a universally understood part of life and not something I paid any conscious attention to. Dominance plays into just about everything we do, all day, every day. On the way into work today you probably got cut off, and it probably pissed you off, because someone just dominated you. Someone just forced you into submission, made you their bitch. You probably don't think that consciously. You, like me, may have on occasion pondered why it's so infuriating. You probably calked it up to "they're so inconsiderate" or "they just put me danger." But that isn't it. You don't want to admit it, but the real reason you got so hot under the collar is because you were just exposed as a big weak bitch in front of the whole highway audience. That's the whole reason behind road rage; some people just can't take it. That guy who cut you off probably showed up to work feeling like a million bucks and talked down to one coworker and made sexual passes at another, feeding off the conquest of his AM commute. When you got to work, you probably met the work day already in a crabby mood and called your boss "sir," further solidifying yourself as a member of the loser monkey club. Then you picked the fleas out of your boss's boss's neck fur. Or, maybe you're the guy who cut the loser monkey off and then had rough sex with your loser monkey secretary when she came in to bring you your starbucks.
In either case it doesn't really matter; the point is, unless you do it in the middle of the night, you can't even gas up your car without being dominated or dominating someone else. "No, I got here first" - it doesn't even need to be said out loud; body language says it all. Or, "Oh, you look like you're in a hurry, go ahead I can wait." - same deal.
But is it really an entirely bad aspect of human/animal nature? That's the part I can't decide. On the one hand it does seem pretty barbaric on the surface, but on the other hand I could argue that without dominance and competition (or are they the same thing?), we would have never left the caves. I could argue that it is our perpetual quest to always be better than everyone else that has brought us from sharp rocks and hot rocks to blenders and microwaves. I could argue that our self-imposed pecking order is what enabled the strongest and the smartest of us to mate with the strongest and smartest of us, resulting in a species that is unsurpassed in its achievements.
But when I apply that logic back to the monkeys, the wheels fall off. They've been biting each other's tails off for eons and they're still just biting each other's tails off. Does their complicated genealogical caste system really serve them to the degree of effort they put into it? Does the group really benefit as a whole by having one super awesome money who gets to bitch-slap whoever he wants, and a few lesser awesome monkeys beneath him who can sit on whatever log they want, regardless of who was sitting there previously? Does the majority of the loser monkeys benefit from having to fetch food for the more awesome monkeys? I don't see where a group of class-equal monkeys would have any lesser chance of success in the wild. But, they are just monkeys. I do not expect their behavior to make sense.
But I do expect us humans' behavior to make sense. Do you think our behavior makes sense?